
|

|

| A Firefighter Stands Watch |
|
|
| At the Ruins of the World Trade Center |
AMERICA = FREEDOM
 |
|
The United States Navy Veterans Association presents...

THE WAR ON TERROR NEWSTAND
The War on Terror Newstand
is an American original.
Since its inception in 2001
with articles appearing on the Homeport Page,
this Newstand has provided
incisive analysis and the hardest talk
with different points of view
to the American people,
all free of charge,
without paid advertisements
and without staff people
who think they're here
to be part of the parade
instead of merely to report on it.
|
 |
 |
|
"Come the three corners of the world in arms, And we shall shock them."
- Shakespeare, King John, v. 7, 1596
The United States of America has defeated all its enemies...all of them...before.
All of these people, despite their claims to the contrary, are mortal....
And we will defeat our current adversaries
the same way...and it will be on a day and at a time of our choosing, not theirs.
***************
"No action planned against the United States by our enemies is inevitable, unless our inaction makes it so."
-President
Ronald Reagan
There are four parts, this Association points out, to Professional Intelligence:
(1)
Intelligence Gatherers: Collect the Information.
(Just the "truth;" we don't care what DCI Casey used to say; rumors
need to be tracked down and verified; remember that if it's garbage in, it's garbage out).
(2) Intelligence Analysts: Analyze the Information.
(No "B.S.")
(3) Intelligence Disseminators: Distribute the Information (to everyone
who needs to know including, if necessary, the public.)
(4) Decisionmakers: Act on the Information in an effective, timely and
preventive way.
It's easy to say. It's harder to do.
And we also point out a very common
problem... the NSA can intercept every telephone call in the world if they want, but if there aren't enough analysts to read
real time every bit of that raw data (physically impossible) and then, and simultaneously, pass the items of importance on
to an intelligence disseminator to make sure it gets to the right political decisionmaker immediately (bureaucratically impossible),
the mere acquisition of that raw data wasn't worth very much in the first place. The USG and its Intelligence
Community have got to work harder to get closer to those "impossible" goals.
***************
The United States Navy Veerans Association has some news for the so-called "Al Aqsa Martyrs'Brigade" in Palestine.
The real martyrs' brigade does not consist of some murderous militants trying to blow up women and little girls in
Israel.
The real Martyrs' Brigade is 3,000 strong, and lives in the Heaven of God, the real God, not your hideous
god, but the God of all our fathers, who created Abraham to be the father of all nations.
They stand together steadfast
there in the victory phalanx of the archangels, and at their front stands an American firefighter from New York City. And
in his left hand, he holds, with a broken haft, a bloodied, but rising American Flag.
And in his right he holds
God's terrible swift sword.
All of these souls are asking us, those who are alive and breathing,
simply, for Justice Triumphant.
We shall not deny them.
***************
"The
only guarantee of victory is to attack."
- Sun-Tzu
A statement repeated, this Association was glad to
see, by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld on the PBS-TV News Hour with Jim Lehrer on 5-22-02.
***************
We'd like to remind our viewers of a scene in a very good pre-9-11 movie starring Harrison Ford as the President,
called "The President's Plane Is Missing." In it terrorists hijack Air Force One and shoot the National Security Advisor dead.
One of the terrorists then puts a cocked .45 caliber pistol to the head of the First Lady, as her young daughter watches,
and threatens America. It is a situation today, post-9-11, any American, man or woman, can identify with. The First
Lady says, simply: "We will never negotiate."
All of us need to adopt her attitude. We don't care what your local
sheriff says, all of these terrorists, foreign and domestic, including your local drug dealer, murderer and violent criminal
(who are the real criminals in America [not the folks speeding at 10 mph over the limit] need to be stood up to with the same
defiance that fictitional First Lady showed: We don't care how many of you there are or how many guns you have; we don't care
how many anti-Americanisms you preach in your local bar on Saturday night to your homeboys. We are the United States of America,
and we will never back down. Not to you. Not to anybody.
As Harrison Ford says in this movie, "If you give a mouse
a cookie, he wants the milk."
***************
"The one thing this country has learned since 9-11 is
that it's O.K. for our kids to be patriotic"
-Tony Orlando
God Bless You, Tony.
***************
***************
"The
policy of this Newstand is very simple - to tell the truth and, in the process, to support the Rebirth of American Patriotism."
***************
The United States Navy Veterans Association current Mission Statement, as it relates
to this Newstand, says that the purposes of the Association shall include:
"The provision of nonpartisan education,
news and analysis pertaining to the value of the goals of the Association, and other issues of interest to veterans, service
members and the patriotic public."
***************
A July 2002 Pew Poll showed 66% of Americans don't understand international news. In the
areas of the War on Terror and National Security, this Association tries to make that news understandable to the average American in
pithy written reports people can chronologically refer to time and time again. This Association also believes that we are
the only media group that brings that news in text format to the average patriotic American in a daily report which is accurate,
reliable, understandable, researchable and which, all at the same time, presents that news from a truly American standpoint.
...And none of that news presentation detracts in the slightest degree from the Association's
charitable programs for service members, veterans, their families, or from our legislative and policy agenda programs.
********************
We Americans have a noisy democracy
in which people, this Association included, and politicians, all filled with strong hearts, and good souls, aggressively put
forward their competing ideas to move America forward.
All these Americans, we should remember in our
political discourse, are patriots. And that in the way our democracy works, with all its conflicts, we are defined as a people.
And that definition sets us apart from all the hoochy-koochy dictatorships of the world, and the views of men like Usama bin
Laden as to how government should work.
And that our democracy, not in spite of our
debate, but because of it, still makes us the last best hope of man on this planet.
********************

|
|
|
|
|
USN@NavyVets.org |
|
|
We continue this Newstand with chronological entries
beginning May 15, 2002, following the last entry on this Newstand on our Homeport Page. For that prior history of the War on Terror, click here:
"WE ARE NOT SAFE."
Before World War II, we thought we were
safe here. We were "across two oceans" and they couldn't get at us.
Pearl Harbor
changed all that.
And so did 9-11.
We are not safe here. The world is a small place nowadays and people like
Al Quaida can threaten us any day they like.
We need to stand up for America as never before. The best defense is
a good offense, and those who threaten us should know, that we will take their war to them, wherever they may be.
We never will be safe as long as fundamentalist
anti-American Islamic terrorism is permitted to breed in any corner of this globe.
As of early May 2002,
it is the opinion of the Association that we have been insufficiently aggressive in carrying out the War on Terror outside
Afghanistan, and against the approximately 100 Al Quaida cells still carrying on their preparations within the United States.
"We are not safe."
-Conclusion of the U.S. 9/11 Commission,
July, 2004
Our words were posted above on this Newstand on May
15, 2002.
You may ask yourselves, as we have asked
ourselves, where they got their words from.
5-15-02: We point out that ground combat is still going on in Afghanistan between
Operation Enduring Freedom Forces and Al Quaida. CENTCOM Commander Tommy Franks said today the War in Afghanistan is "far
from over." See our prediction, Veterans' Issues Newstand on our Homeport Page, 1-24-02.
5-27-02: The Tunisian
president, Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, has just re-elected himself (he's ruled Tunisia since 1987), by reason of a government-rigged
referendum, for another 10 years minimum.
This guy is a strange bird. He is clearly anti-Islamic fundamentalist, and
that drives him. Zine is westernized, but he is not necessarily pro-U.S. He rules Tunisia as a dictator would. The westernized
population of Muslim Tunisia, on the tip of North Africa due west of Libya, basically likes the guy, which would remain true
even if Zine allowed free elections.
The Association doubts he would let Tunisia be used, even temporarily, for U.S.
bases, but the Administration could try a little bit more to bring him into the fold.
5-29-02: The military
(the "National Liberation Front" - NLF) rules another of Tunisia's neighbors, Algeria, and also stages rigged elections there
to keep themselves in power, most recently in May 2002, where the rigged results said they won 52% of the vote. The Algerian
junta, like Zine in Tunisia, is driven by keeping down Islamic fundamentalism, and that is good, but they have killed 10,000
Muslim fundamentalists per year for the past ten years to keep themselves in power. The Algerian junta, for domestic reasons,
like Zine, is not likely to jump on board any USG driven train against Saddam or against Islamic terrorism aimed at the U.S.
but, as with Zine, the USG should try to get as much help out of them as we can. The overall situation for a democratic,
pro-U.S. government in Algeria, unlike Tunisia, is bleak.
5-30-02: The Bush Administration announces other
changes to FBI guidelines. Only to prosecute terrorism, the Bureau can now (this may come as a surprise to you) view things
"in plain sight," including surfing the net, attend political and religious (read: Muslim) events, and look over your shoulder
at a public library. As opposed to totalitarian changes made by CAPS II and new American DMV regulations, which this Association
opposes, we support these FBI changes simply because the old guidelines, in the name of preventing racial, political, religious
and ethnic profiling, tied one hand of the FBI behind their backs in investigating and preventing America's greatest threat,
Islamic terror. Unlike the shotgun approach of CAPS II and the DMV proposals aimed at all Americans, these FBI changes
are targetted specifically like a rifle shot at the Islamic terrorists in our midsts, and that is what is reasonable about
them.
6-5-02: On the same note as our 5-30-02 story (ethnic profiling against foreigh Islamics),
the Justice Department announces that "high risk" foreigners visiting the U.S. may be fingerprinted, photographed and tracked
in accordance with an INS law on the books since 1952. As we've said many times on this Newstand, we need to single out
foreign Islamics, in which case this new policy makes eminent good sense. See also our 9-15-01 Recommendations to the Nation
on our Homepage Guestbook. But fingerprinting needs to be followed through on, and that requires manpower and resources,
and probably will be mostly ineffective since most of the suicidalists sent here by terrorist groups don't have criminal records
when they arrive and, after they carry out their terrorist acts, they're already dead, nevertheless this is probably a small
step in the right direction. Fear of ethnic profiling (and specific targetting), when it comes to travel, does two substantially
negative things to Americans at the same time: First, it precludes America from prioritizing our limited law enforcement resources
on the real threat; Second, it invites foreign countries to deceitfully, and tit-for-tat, manipulate the War on Terror to
harass innocent Americans from travelling to their countries, in violation of what should be known as those Americans' freedom
of travel.
RELATED STORIES DEALING MORE GENERALLY WITH INTERNAL CHANGES TO THE STRUCTURE OF AMERICAN LAW ENFORCEMENT
CAN BE FOUND ON THE NSI NEWSTAND.
6-6-02: Philippine troops locate and raid the Abu Sayef camp where the Burnhams
are being held. [WOT 1-9-02]. Martin Burnham is killed; Gracia Burnham is freed, but injured. Four Abu Sayef were killed.
No U.S. combat troops participated in the raid itself. The new President of the Philippines Macapagal: "We will not
stop until Abu Sayef is finished." That's what we want too, Madam President.
On the same day, official efforts
to recover bodies from the WTC cease. Of approximately 2800 people murdered there on 9-11, approximately 1800 bodies have
not been recovered. Most of those probably never will be. Never forget, America.
6-7-02: The Association
has learned that Mohammed Atta, the chief 9-11 hijacker, actually applied for a $650,000 Department of Agriculture loan for
a large crop-duster (no flight plans required) to load up with "insect poison" in every available square foot (as this Association
has said befor on this Site, these guys have chutzpah, but they know that for many years now, the average foreigner in the
U.S. could [and can] get at least a $50,000 interest-free loan to start things like convenience stores from some U.S. Government
agency, while the average natural-born American could not get scratch from those same agencies.) During the course of his
pre-9-11 DA loan application interview, Atta expressed interest in Pentagon pictures on the wall, Seattle and the Dallas Cowboys
Stadium in Irving.
6-10-02: The USG announces the arrest May 8 in Chicago, as he was returning on a flight
from Europe where he met with Al Quaida operatives, of Brooklyn-born Chicago resident Jose Padilla, 31, a.k.a. Abdullah Al
Mujahadir ("the Immigrant"). Padilla is currently being held as an enemy combatant at the Charleston Naval Weapons Station.
The USG believes he was in the last stages of a plan to explode a dirty radioactive bomb in Washington, D.C. Padilla had
converted to Islam earlier while incarcerated on a number of violent crime charges. It has long been the opinion of this Association
that there are too many of these prison mullahs preaching anti-American politics in our prisons, in the guise of religion,
and converting these young, impressionable inmates not to a faith in God but, rather, a faith in anti-American Islamic terror.
Paddilla's arrest, as a preventive matter, marks a success for the incremental Bush Administration anti-terror steps we
have talked about here on the NSI and WOT Newstands, and also refects on specific warnings this Association has put out on
those two Newstands as to what Al Quaida is planning next. Americans should remember that AL Gama'a tried to take down the
WTC in 1993 and failed, but that Al Quaida did just that in 2001.
6-11-02:
Assuming we use U.S. Navy carriers for air strikes to
overthrow Saddam, Navy officials have told this Association those air strikes would not be effective enough unless we are
assisted by, at a minimum, air strike bases in Turkey, Kuwait and Qatar, assuming the Saudis and Bahrainis refuse us permission
for air strikes from their soil, as now seems likely to the Association.
Although Navy sources have told this Association that
confidentially, other intelligence sources have opined that Saddam could be overthrown and replaced without that specific
assistance, but at a higher cost in U.S. troop casualties on the ground.
Our intelligence staff predicts that history will repeat
itself and that, given sufficient air strike "softening up' operations, Saddam's army, during an invasion, will cut and run,
and he will be overthrown.
What comes thereafter in Iraq is entirely a new political
question for the United States Government.
***************
STAY TUNED BELOW.
***************
|
 |

|
|
****************************
THE REALLY, REALLY BAD BOYS OF FOREIGN, JIHADIST AND ANTI-AMERICAN
TERROR:
THESE
GUYS SHOULD BE FEATURED NON-STOP ON AMERICA'S MOST WANTED.
Hamas,
Bamas, Sha-mas. Having trouble keeping those Arab and Muslim terrorist groups straight in your own mind?
Most Americans
are.
So the Association
is bringing you here, as of October, 2004, as a special feature, an updated
GLOSSARY OF THE MAJOR ARAB AND ISLAMIC TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS
Our
use of the phrase terrorist organizations is the Association's usage without regard to which government may or may not currently
be calling these organizations "terrorist." No states are included in this list.
For a list of terrorist states, see WOT, 1-24-02.
There are around 300 major non-state
organizations in the world which could probably and legitimitely be called "terrorist," inasmuch as they use terror as a major
and fundamental weapon, as well as a sub-ideology, to promote their cause, e.g. the drug-dealing FARC in Colombia [WOT, 2-24-02],
as opposed to movements which are merely revolutionary in nature (an important difference), but we have space enough only
to include here the major Arab and Islamic players as of date, so keep your eyes on these guys.
Groups are arranged
under their topical headings by order of importance, including rankings by current threat and activity levels.
AL QUAIDA AND ITS MAJOR FOREIGN LINKS (IRAQ BASED TERROR IS LISTED SEPARATELY):
Al Quaida
["The
Base"] :
- Fanatical Islamic group (a group of groups), headed by Usama bin Laden

(DPOB:
1955; Jidda, Saudi Arabia).
Murderously
dedicated to the military, political and economic destruction of the United States, and the death of every American male and
every Jew, and the establishment of a unified Muslim state "which follows the rules of the Caliphs." ["Caliphs" in Arabic
simply means the descendants of the chiefs of Muhammed the Prophet who, after the death of Muhammed, did in fact, in the name
of Islam ("Islam" means "Submission to the Will of Allah" in Arabic) conquer one city and territory after another: Baghdad,
Damascus, Persia, North Africa, Jerusalem, Spain and eventually the Eastern Roman Empire.]
Cells operating worldwide today include the U.S., Europe, Bosnia, Chechnya, Tajikistan, Georgia, Somalia, Yemen,
Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kosovo, Philippines, Algeria and Eritrea.
If
you can read Arabic, you can intelligibly access some of Al Quaida's Internet message forums, monitored
round the clock by U.S. intelligence, by clicking here, here or here.
If you want to see this Islamist-fascist bin Laden in action in English in his latest video (2006), along with
one of his American born treasonous Al Quaida co-members, reminiscing about the 9/11 attack, click here.
Sayed bin Laden, the son of Usama bin Laden, the Association has learned, is poised to take over Al Quaida, should
anything happen to his father.
There is a theory among criminologists that violent crime, as a gene, is inheritable. If ever there were a bunch of poster
boys for that theorem, it's the males of the bin Laden family. Many of them still roam the world unhindered and at large as some of its richest citizens, defensive
of what bin Laden is still doing.
Taliban
[" The Seekers"] :
- Former fanatical
Islamic fundamentalist government of Afghanistan,

headed by Mullah Omar, overthrown by
U.S. and Afghan forces in 2004. The Taliban provided protection for Al Quaida training and operations. The Taliban
was first formed in 1994 in Kandahar by graduates of Pakistani madrasas (See, WOT 12-28-01).
Vanguards
of Conquest
[Islamic Jihad]:

- Extremely violent offshoot of Al-Gama'a [See Egyptian Terror], headed by Dr.
Ayman al-Zawahiri, still Usama bin Laden's right-hand man as of date. Primarily Egyptian membership, but operates worldwide.
Part of Al Quaida. Specializes in assassinations. Platform includes killing all American males, all Jews, establishment of
a world radical Islamic state. When these guys say "Conquest," that's exactly what they mean: the conquest of the entire world
by one unified militantly fundamentalist Islamic theocracy.
Jamat-e-Islami :
-Pakistan's version of the Taliban movement (see, Taliban),

primarily active in Indian-controlled portions
of Kashmir.
Chechen Liberation Movement:

The Chechen Liberation Movement is an amalgam
of three or more guerilla movements, each with their own military units. One is clearly Arab in nationality, foreigners who
have been inserted into Chechnya and Russia by Al Quaida supporters to carry out terrorism against Russia.
The movement dates back to 1990, and seeks
an independent and Islamist Chechnya. In 1994, the Russians began sending troops into Chechnya, largely destroying its capital,
Grozny, in 1995. Russian occupation of Chechnya continues into 2004, with over 100,000 Russian troops there as of that year, as
do growing terror attacks by the pro-Chechen units, especially within the heart of European Russia.
As of 2004, with their increasing and
substantial murders of Russian schoolchildren, opera goers and subway travellers, all "soft targets," the animals who run
this group, and all of its component parts, including the Al Quaidists among them which had been placed on this list
previously, in the opinion of the Editors of this Newstand, crossed a distinct line between "independence" and "guerilla"
movements into the clearcut territory of Islamist terrorism.
Abu Sayef :
-Islamic extremist para-military group
operating in the southern Philippines.

Split from the Moro National Liberation Front
in 1991. About 900 armed soldiers, extremely violent, specializes in kidnapping and murdering Westerners.

Previously funded by Gaddafi's Libya.
Some members trained with Al Quaida.
Abu Sayef operations commander, Abu Zabayef, was killed in waters off Mindanao after a firefight with
Philippine Army Counter-Terrorism troops on 6-20-02. According to Philippine Army counterinsurgency sources as of the Summer of 2003, this group
may be breaking up and re-forming under the name of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front.
Under whatever name, these people are not
going to go away until every last one of them is eradicated, age and gender exceptions not accepted. They consitute a mortal
threat to every American living in, or travelling to, the Philippines, and to American economic interests in the Philippines,
and that alone would be a justification for the United States to drive them off the face of the earth. Their existence also
consitutes a deadly and imminent threat to the natural freedoms of every decent citizen of the world, Filipinos included.
Islamic Jama'a
aka Al
Jama'a
aka
Jama'a al Islamiya (Islamic Group):
- The Indonesian Islamic Jama'a is headed by Abu Bakr Bashir (born August, 1938), ("The current U.S. President
[George W. Bush] is the very worst President ever.") .

Bashir
was released in 2006 from a prison term he weas serving for his role in the Bali tourist bombings.
At
his sentencing in 2005, he pronounced:"God will destroy his enemies." (He means the U.S.)
The
organization bases itself on the Egyptian al-Gama'at al Islamiya, which specializes in targetting western tourists for murder.
Islamic
Jama'a was responsible for the Bali tourist bombings reported on this Newstand.
Tourism
means a lot of national income to many third world governments which are friendly to the United States, and therefore
are despised by Muslim terrorists. Moreover, the tourist target is a soft target.
As a parenthetical remark, we should mention
that many, if not most of the jihadist terrorist groups target tourism, not just because it is a soft target but also, equally
because their belief systems are based on a throwback to a 13th Century Caliphate state, where Western infkuences, any Western
influence, was not welcome. If jihadists like the Taliban , Saddam or any of the others mentioned in this Glossary actually
seized power anew, one of the first things they would probably do in "their" country would be to ban or restrict the
free movement of people across their borders. This is because all these groups have one paramount fear: the free movement
of ideas.
Islamic
Jama'a seeks a multinational fanatical Islamic state encompassing Indonesia, Malaysia and the southern Philippines (a "Caliphate"
state). Jama'a buried into the school system during the Suharto years, calling themselves the oppressed majority, so they
are not going to disappear with the execution of one or two of their top leaders. They may disappear when the Indonesian people
as a whole get tired of routine terror bombings on their islands and in their tourist centers.
IRAQ
BASED TERROR
Al Quaida in Iraq:
Formerly
called, simply, Jihad, as well as Ansar al Islam, this group now seeks to serve as an umbrella group, as of
2007, for professional Islamic fundamentalist terrorists from any country, with the goal of killing Coalition soldiers in
Iraq (currently offering $500 for each U.S. soldier killed) and the expulsion of those Forces from Iraq. While Islamic in
nature, the group is an amalgam of Saddamites, Sunnis, Shi'ites and Al Quaida operativeswho easily might, and probably would,
turn on each other, when and if the U.S. decides to leave Iraq and, by "leave," we mean U.S. Forces.
One of its key subgroups is the Mujahedeen Shura Council,
which has 15 combat brigades and two suicide brigades. About half of the Mujahedeen Shura Council terrorists are non-Iraqis.
Regardless of whether they are mentioned in the Glossary
elsewhere as groups belonging to Iraqi based terror, the following groups in Iraq, as of 2008, have ties to or are associated
with, the political wing of the Mujahedeen Shura Council: Society of the True Believers, Army of the Prophet's Companions,
Al-Fatihin Army, Knights of Monotheism, Army of the Abrahamic Tradition, Islamic Army in Iraq, Mujahedeen Army, Ansar al-Sunnah
Army and the 1920 Revolution Brigades.
Al Quaida in Iraq's head, as of June 2006, after
the killing of the animal who formerly headed this group by U.S. Forces, is Abu Ayyub Al-Masri

an Egyptian member of Al-Gama'a (see below, Egyptian based terror) since at least
1992, and a bomb expert.
Mahdi Army:
Loyal to
Shiite leader Muqtada al-Sadr. Armed insurgents throughout Iraq openly targetting U.S. troops. Probably about 60,000 armed
operatives as of 2007.
Islamic Army in Iraq:
Major
Sunni terrorist group, a mix of tribal leaders and officials of the Saddam Hussein regimes, with 13 brigades. Responsible
for attacks on U.S. Forces, Shi'ites, hostage takings and hostage murders. Its splinter groups include the Al-Rashideen Army,
the Mujahedeen Army (which operates against British and Australian Forces in southern Iraq), the Al-Fatihin Army and the Jihad
Factions of Iraq.
Islamic Resistance Front:
Major Nationalist Sunni terror group with a propaganda
arm; stages frequent attacks against U.S. and distributes videos of them. Opposes suicide bombings, the use of foreign fighters
and the killing of Shi'ites.
1920 Revolution Brigades:
A nationalist Sunni terror group named for Iraq's nationalist
revolution. Aims attacks against the U.S. and the Iraqi government, but avoids outright attacks on Shi'ites. Also opposes
suicide bombings and the use of foreign fighters.
Imam Ali
bin-Abi Talib Jihadi Brigades:
Shiite group vowing to kill occupying troops and to assassinate
members of the U.S. backed Iraqi government.
Al-Awdah
["The Return"]:
Ex-intelligence officers under Saddam who seek restoration
of a Baathist regime. Located in northern Iraq.
Iraqi Resistance Islamic Front:
Warns against Jewish conspiracies in Iraq.
National Front for the Liberation of Iraq:
Concentrated in northern Iraq. Armed insurgents.
Iraqi National Islamic Resistance:
Armed terrorists vowing to kill all foreigners in
Iraq.
Al Quds:
Local militias, often Baath Party loyalists.
Special Security Organization:
Ethnic Sunni group loyal to Saddam and based around Tikrit,
Hawuija and Samarra.
Ansar Al Sunnah:
One of the most extreme Sunni terrorist groups, comprised
of Kurdish Sunnis, with 16 brigades. Anti-American, but also anti-Shiite and anti-pro-government Kurds. Uses extreme brutality.
PALESTINIAN-BASED TERROR
PLO
[Palestinian Liberation Organization]:

-
The Palestinian nationalist umbrella group (a group of groups) which represents all groups seeking an independent Palestinian
state. Founded in 1964, it's Chairman is

Mahmoud
Abbas, appointed in 2004 after the death of the PLO's founding Chairman, Yasser Arafat.
Abbas was a former Palestinian Authority prime minister foisted on Arafat by the USG as a moderate "third
force" willing to accept the Bush Administration's roadmap to peace in the Mid-East. He later resigned when Arafat would not
cede authority over the Palestinian security forces to him. This Newstand is watching current events closely to see
if we can remove the PLO from this Glossary of Terrorist Organizations.
Palestinian Authority:

- The current name of the government, set
up by agreement between Israel and the PLO, to administer certain responsibilities in designated areas in Gaza and the West
Bank.
Its first president was Yasser Arafat (1929-2004).

Its second president (head of state) is Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen). See
above, under PLO.
This Newstand will not remove the Palestinian Authority from its Glossary until the PA
takes definitive and successful steps to destroy all Palestinian armed militant anti-Jewish organizations within its borders,
and not just to negotiate with them as equals. When that occurs the PA will come off the Glossary. Not sooner, not later.
Al-Fatah:

- Palestinian political movement headed titularly by

Farouk Kadoumi, a part of the PLO.
8,000 members. Sponsors terrorist activities in Israel. Funded by Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, other Persian Gulf states. Has received
heavy arms from Iran, China and North Korea.
In a surprising moderate move, in November,
2004, Fatah nominated PLO president and moderate Mahmoud Abbas as its candidate for the elective office of President of the
Palestinian Authority. Abbas believes Palestinian security forces should be used more aggressively within the Palestinian
territories to quash armed militants seeking to carry out terrorist activities against Israel.
Tanzin:
-Tanzin was Arafat's private militia in the West Bank and Gaza. They provide suicide bombers to
Al Aqsa, and fund those suicide bombers over Arafat's signature.
Al Aqsa Brigades
-Major part of Al Fatah sponsoring suicide bombers in Israel. Specializes in recruiting children and
teenagers. Also see, Tanzin.
Hamas:

- Part of the PLO; holds the prime ministership (head of government) of the Palestinian Authority; founded
1967.
Primarily
responsible for politically organizing the Intifada ("uprising") against Israel in the West Bank and Gaza.
Hamas
runs clinics, groceries and terror schools on the West Bank. The terror arm is called the Izzidene al Qassam Brigades.

They provide
money, lots of it, to the families of every barbarian terrorist who is killed, along with a video of the thug bragging about
his or her planned murders. The two long time leaders of Hamas, Sheikh Ahmed Yasin

( "Sheikh" is merely a title in Arabic), and Abdel Aziz Rantisi, both of whom were killed by Israeli security forces in 2004, were vicious murderers
and anti-Semites, who openly preached death to Israel and the killing of all Jews worldwide.
The new leader of Hamas after
the death of Yassin and Rantisi, is Khaled Mashaal,

a hard-line ideologue sheltered
by Syria, funded by Iran, who is in control of the money flow to Hamas.
Hamas
is financially bankrolled by Iran, private donors throughout the Arab world, and by phony charity fronts they have operated
for years in the U.S. soliciting from the public without any questions being asked, until 2001, by U.S. law enforcement.
Mossad, Israel's intelligence service, actually participated in the creation of Hamas in its earliest days, in trying
to funnel disparate Islamic radicals into discrete groups on the theory they would be more easily controllable that way. It
was a theory that backfired, badly.
Hamas
still refers to Israel's 1947 war of independence as "Al Nakhba," the catastrophe.
Hamas won a majority in the Palestinian
Authority parliament in 2006, as this Newstand predicted they would, and formed the government.
Palestinian Islamic Jihad:
This is the Palestinian branch [Al-Jihad al-Islami] of Islamic Jihad, headed,
as of 2004, by Ramadan Abdullah Shallah,

a personal friend of, and former co-worker with, Dr. Sami Al Arian of the University
of South Florida, who raised major funding for the organization in the United States. Its intellectual roots lie more
with the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood than with Al-Gama'a.
The Islamic Jihad’s ideology blended Palestinian nationalist ideas with themes drawn
from three other sources: the ideology of the Muslim Brethren; patterns of activity of the militant Islamist groups
in Egypt; and, uniquely among Sunni movements, the teachings of Ayatollah Khomeini, the Shi`i leader of the Islamic
revolution in Iran. The latter theme has established a strong operational and finacial linkage between Palestinian
Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah.
According to the Islamic Jihad, a proper
reading of the Koran and an understanding of history would lead to the conclusion that Palestine is the focus of
the religio-historical confrontation between the Muslims and their eternal enemies, the Jews. The Muslims represent
the forces of truth (haq) while the Jews (and Christians) embody the forces of apostasy (batil). In the context of
this confrontation, the Palestine problem is the core of a Western offensive that began with Napoleon’s
invasion of Egypt in 1798 and reached its climax in 1918 with the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire, which had symbolized
Islamic unity. According to this view, Palestine was always the focus of Western imperialist designs and was
meant to serve as a launch pad to take over other Muslim territories.
Palestinian Islamic Jihad holds the
allegiance of about 4% of the Palestinian population.Its military and terror arm is the Al Quds Brigade.
Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
[PFLP]:
-Strongest Marxist-Leninist group,
founded in 1967 by George Habash, within the PLO. Still openly promotes the destruction of Israel by force.
LEBANESE-BASED TERROR
Hezbollah
["Party of God]:

- Radical Shiite (Shii'a is an Iranian-based sect of Islam) group in Lebanon from 1982 on,
financed and directed by the Iranian mullahs with assistance from Syrian intelligence. Thousands of members, over one million
sympathizers in Lebanon. Blew up the USMC barracks at Beirut Airport in 1982. Dedicated to the destruction of Israel and the
removal of all Western influence (the "Great Satan") from the Islamic world. Sponsors schools and charities, but 100% violent;
uses suicide attacks, kidnappings, murder, truck bombs, and tactical military assaults on Israeli Army positions.
Hezbollah Sheikh Nasrullah

Although
formerly a rival of Al Quaida, they began getting together with the latter as of 2002 to share intelligence and
to act in concert.
Hezbollah has raised so many funds
for itself worldwide, it even has its own television station, Al Manar.
Abu Nidal Organization
[a.k.a. Black September]:
-
Several hundred plus militia in Lebanon. Funded by Syrian intelligence. Currently headed by Sabri al-Banna; split from the
PLO (considered by Black September to be too moderate) in 1974.
Its original head, Abu Nidal, died mysteriously in Baghdad, where he had sought refuge, in August, 2002. Probably
something to do with a dispute with saddam. To Saddam, violence was politics, and politics was violence.
EGYPTIAN-BASED TERROR
Al-Gama'a
["The
Group"]
[Al
Gama'at al Islamiya] ,
[Jama'a
Islamia,(Islamic Group)]:
- Egypt's pre-eminent Islamic extremist
group, headed by the blind Sheikh Umar Abd al-Rahman

(in prison in the U.S.). Seeks to overthrow the Egyptian government and replace it with a Taliban-like state.
Thousands of hard-core members in Cairo, Alexandria (particularly among unemployed graduates and students) and throughout
rural Egypt; millions of sympathizers in Egypt. Funded by Iran, probably others. Some former members were part of the 9-11
hijackers. Close links to Al Quaida.
Gama'a
murdered President Anwar Sadat of Egypt in 1981 and attempted to blow up the World Trade Center in 1993.
Recent
pamphlets in 2002 put out by Al Gama'a members in prison in Egypt denouncing Islamic terror are phony, paid for by the Mubarak
government.
Al-Gama'at al-Islamiya has particularly
strong strength in the Al Minya, Asyu't, Qina and Soha governates of southern Egypt, which are so popular with western tourists.
Armed attacks on those tourists have become a specialty of this group since 1992.
Muslim Brotherhood:

- Egypt's oldest radical Islamic movement, founded in 1928. Anti-Zionist to the core, dedicated
to the overthrowal of Israel. Responsible in part for the overthrowal of Egypt's monarchy in the 1950's and the installation
of Gamal Abdel Nasser as President, whom the Brotherhood later turned on for being too secular. Thousands of members and hundreds
of thousands of sympathizers throuhout the Arab world still today. Has a slightly more literary and intellectual bent than
some of the other more pro-active Egyptian-based groups.
Their
current platform calls for breaking Egyptian ties with Israel; denouncing the U.S. (and its current $2 billion in annual aid
to Egypt); and sending Egyptian soldiers to fight as guerillas in Palestine against Israel. It is today gaining strength in
membership among the young, rich, intellectually oriented Egyptian elite.
Editors' Note:
You
may see "new" groups not mentioned here claimng responsibility in the news for brand new acts of terrorism. These people have
a habit, going back many years, of creating new names for themselves to give the illusion there are more of them than there
are. Trust us, as of 2006, 90% of all Islamist terrorist acts in the world can be traced back to one or more of the groups
mentioned here.
MISCELLANEOUS ARABIC TERRORIST VOCABULARY
Abu:
When used in a man's
name, is a nickname known as a kunya in Arabic. It means "father of" and is followed by the first name of the firstborn son.
This epithet is currently widely used by terrorists to create pseudonyms for themselves.
Fedayeen:
simply means militia, or a militia, or militiaman or men.
Intifada:
"Uprising," commonly used to refer to Palestinians throwing stones at, and shooting, Israelis in the West
Bank and Gaza.
Mujahaddin:
"Soldier of God," a term commonly associated with Afghan fighters who opposed the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan
in the 1980's.
***************
THE ORIGINS OF ISLAM
The Prophet Muhammed, the founder
of Islam - which means 'submission to the will of God' - was born in Mecca, in Arabia, in 570 A.D. In about 610, he
said he began to receive revelations from God and in 613 he began preaching to the public in Mecca. Later, his revelations
were written down to form the Koran. These revelations pronounce, among other things, that there is only one God, that the
figures of the Old and New Testaments were prophets of a sort, but that Muhammed is the only true prophet of God, that women
are to be subjugated to man ('plough into them as ye will, like they were chaffs of wheat'), and that Islamic law should
govern all aspects of public and private, social and economic, religious and political life, for all men and women everywhere,
from the beginning of time to the end of time.
Muhammed and his followers were
forced to flee from Mecca in 622 because of disputes with Mecca's chamber of commerce. Muhammed's adherents recaptured Mecca
by military force in 629, and Islam began to spread as a religious and political force, a force it still is today. By 733
A.D. Islam had spread in an arc extending from Spain to India.
**********************************
MODERATION IN THE KORAN
There are two verses - only two
verses - in all the Koran, which condemn killing, and only one verse which condemns 'slaying' explicitly. It is these verses
that the Bush Administration, people like the Editors of USA Today, and moderate Muslims gamble on when
they appeal to Muslims to condemn and stand against radical jihadists. Here these two short verses are:
"Guide us away from the path of anger....";
and
"Slaying is never justified - other than
in cases of murder or for those who do mischief in the land...." [Emphasis added.]
The Muslim world is, in fact, in 2006, totally
fragmented as to what Islam is, or should be, but there are millions of Muslims in the world who believe in moderate Islam,
as opposed to radical Islam, fundamentalist Islam, or jihadist Islam.
*****************************
WHERE THE MUSLIMS ARE, 2006:
Arab countries 284
million
Sub-Saharan Africa
254 million
Pakistan and Bangladesh
230 million
Afghanistan 23 million
Indonesia 196 million
Remainder of Southeast Asia
30 million
India 133 million
China 133 million
Iran 65 million
Turkey 62 million
Azerbaijan 49 million
Russia 27 million
European Union 10
million (out of 400 million total population)
Latin , Central and South
America 2 million
U.S. and Canada 10
million (out of 330 million total population)
************************************
NUMBER OF ADHERENTS FOR MAJOR
RELIGIONS, 2006:
Christianity 2.1
billion
Islam 1.5 billion
Hinduism 900 million
Buddhism 376 million
Sikhism 23 million
Judaism 14 million
************************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
6-13-02:
The Bush Administration has stockpiled approximately
350,000 potassium iodine pills to prevent the thyroid gland from spreading cancer, for free distribution to the public, in
case of a radioactive attack on the U.S.
The action taken demonstrates the seriousness of
the threat.
6-27-02:
After coming around to the accuracy of "secret"
information this Association pointed out on this Newstand months ago, about Yasser Arafat's personal approval of funding for
terrorist activities against Israeli women and children, President Bush urges Arafat's removal, presumably by democratic means.
Secretary of State Colin Powell, for the time being,
will no longer meet with Arafat. [Powell is not totally in sync with the new Bush statement.]
National Security Advisor Condaleeza Rice goes
even further on 6-30-02, calling Arafat "corrupt" (in simple English, this means Arafat and other leaders in his Palestinian
Authority are lining their pockets with Western aid) and somebody who "works with terror."
If you read the thread of our dated News and Analysis
on this Newstand going back to 2001, you might think this Association is prescient.
We're not. We just appear to be because of our
Inside-the-Beltway connections.
7-6-02:
One of Afghanistan's Vice-Presidents, Abdul Khadir,
is shot dead by Al Quaida gunmen, who escape scot-free, in broad daylight in Kabul. As we have previously said on this Newstand,
without peacekeeping forces (German Forces were the ones assigned to protect Khadir) in Afghanistan, President Karzai's pro-American
fledgling government would fall and, as we have said on the NSI Newstand, we project U.S. Forces will remain in Afghanistan
at least into 2004 or 2005.
Khadir had especially hated the opium poppy
dealing in Afghanistan carried out by Al Quaida and others, which is responsible in large part for the current heroin epidemic
in the U.S.
7-15-02:
John Walker Lindh (the "American Taliban") pleads
guilty, as a 21-year old, in a U.S. Federal District Court, to serving with the Taliban, and will receive a 20-year sentence
in federal prison, releasing him at about age 41.
Lindh, who still professes to be a devout Muslim,
will not be the same man upon his release that he is today.
This is a fair sentence given the USG could not
directly prove Lindh's direct involvement in the murder of CIA officer Johnnie Spann.
Lindh's lawyer, James Brosnahan, says he asked
the federal prosecutors whom Lindh hurt, and claims he got no answer. We would have answered Brosnahan's question this way:
Lindh conspired with Usama bin Laden and the Taliban to kill Americnas, including Johnnie Spann. That's whom he hurt. And
that's whom you hurt, too, Brosnahan, by representing this scumbag merely to line your own pocket.
On the same date, a Pakistani judge convicts and
sentences to death by hanging, Akmar Omar Sheikh, the main murderer in the death of Daniel Pearl. This sentence shows the
commitment of Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf to the War on Terror aginst Al Quaida, in the face of threats of
violence against his government in Pakistan, which are sure to materialize.
7-17-02:
The USG, through Undersecretary of Defense Paul
Wolfowitz, promises Turkey it will not seek an independent Kurdish state in the north of Iraq. Ankara hates and fears the
Kurds because Turkey has a sizable Kurdish minority in its east bordering Iraq, which is perennially in a state of uprising
against the central government. Apparently this promise, designed to elucidate Turkish support for the coming attack on Saddam,
was not enough for the Turkish prime minister since, shortly thereafter, the Turkish Foreign Ministry issued a statement saying
Turkey opposes any attack on the integrity of the Iraqi state, but Association sources have told us privately that Turkey
will back a U.S. attack on Saddam if the USG forgives a few billions in debt.
The USG is also trying to reinitialize talks with
the primary anti-Saddam Shiite group (Iraq is 80% Shiite, although its leaders are technically Sunni) which, unfortunately,
is based in Iran and under the control of the anti-American mullahs who run that country.
The Bush Administration has, in our opinion, a
ways to go in tidying up its plans for a post-Saddam Iraq. First, many of the Kurds (unlike the pro-Iranian Shiites) are pro-American,
and a Kurdish state is almost a sine qua non to keep a post-Saddam Iraq in line, but Turkey needs also necessarily to be brought
on board. Second, the Shiites don't need to separate from Baghdad, but they do need religious and political autonomy. Third,
we need a central, pro-U.S. government in Baghdad which firmly controls Iraq's oil.
Even though killing Saddam may turn out to be easy
(assuming he doesn't hide and run like Usama bin Laden) and his army may be wiped out on the ground (with long term bio-chem
effects, however, felt by U.S. troops), establishing what we want thereafter in Iraq isn't going to be easy, but the USG needs
nevertheless to get all this done.
And when and if we do all this, as we've said before
on our Newstands, we need to tell the rest of the opponents of U.S. interests in the Mid-East: We did this against all odds,
and if you don't get in line, you're next.
7-25-02:
As of date, there are approximately 600 Al Quaida
suspects being held at Guantanamo. The overwhelming majority have refused to answer any questions posed by interrogators.
7-31-02:
U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, in testimony
before a closed meeting of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and reflecting almost verbatim the opinion of this Association
stated at the top of this Page in May, says that the War on Terror " is not being prosecuted with sufficient drive or imagination",
sources have told the Association.
An Update from us on the Afghan War:
U.S. Forces have taken over responsibility
from the Germans and Afghans for the personal protection of Afghan President Hamid Karzai. As we said on this Newstand earlier
this year, Karzai's government would fall if it were not for Allied protection. This does not mean, however, that Karzai is
a puppet. He is not. It does mean that, in today's Afghanistan, whoever is in power, many enemies abound.
Real political control in Afghanistan vests with
the local warlords today, who have their own forces. The Bush Administration supports this division of power there since it
does not wish to commit huge numbers of American troops as a U.S. obligation to that country in order to secure Afghan allegiance
to a central government in Kabul. Whatever you have to say about the warlords, they are a whole lot better than the Taliban.
The political problem posed to the U.S., though, by the warlords, (given the hatred of them by fundamentalist Muslims), is
that their existence in and of itself creates the fertile ground in the population for a new Taliban to breed and grow.
It's more than possible we can do it Bush's way.
We chased out the Taliban and Al Quaida from Afghanistan with more or less only one division of U.S. troops on the ground.
If that remains the primary mission, we can probably keep it up indefinitely. If that's what it takes, we should do it.
But concomitant with that policy is the spinoff
that the government of the Afghans is up to them, provided it does not include the Taliban: this may mean Afghans murdering
Afghans as the warlords are wont to do, in the struggle for internal power. And the USG probably must, in some way, be sucked
in in support of some anti-Taliban leaders just as the Soviets were in Afghanistan in favor of their Communist leaders, and
as we were in Vietnam in favor of Diem and, later, the military. When those pro-U.S. Afghan leaders are killed or disgraced,
the egg will be on our face in world and Afghan opinion, not on theirs.
So the Afgahn War is a delicate new war. This Association
supports President Bush's policies there, but the management of that war requires great concentration and thought, and may
also involve more American casualties than we've seen there to date.
8-3-02:
Russia says it will reconsider its plans to continue
building nuclear reactors for terrorist Iran, as a sign that President Bush's anti-terror coalition still has a lot of strength.
8-15-02:
There is an upsurge of U.S. C-5 traffic in and
out of Qatar's Al-Udeid Air Base, signalling that clear preparations for the upcoming war against Iraq are under way.
Whether Qatar, a Persian Gulf country about the size of Connecticut with a population of 700,00, under popular Sheikh Hamad
bin Khalifa Al-Thani, will support the war is anybody's quess.
Saddam has begun to disperse his bio weapons stock
from Baghdad in anticipation of a U.S. strike, intelligence sources have told the Association.
Continuing Al Quaida terror attacks in Kandahar
and Kabul underline our previous prediction U.S. troops will remain in Afhanistan probably into 2005. Meanwhile, intelligence
sources have told the Association that the Afghan government will need an army of at least 150,000 to police the country and
that it will take 5 years or more to build that kind of force.
8-15-02:
600 American surviving victims of 9-11 file a Washington,
D.C civil federal district court lawsuit against, specifically, three Saudi princes, Muslim charities in the U.S. and Mid-Eastern
banks assisting terrorism.
All of the allegations in their 258 page complaint
are true, according to all the facts this Association has at hand, even though the USG won't stand behind any of them.
Their lawsuit faces difficulties on grounds of
jurisdiction, service of process, and the burden of proof they face against specific named defendants.
As one victim said, " It is [apparently] up to
us to see that terrorists pay a price, and are put out of business."
Their suit asks for $1 trillion in damages.
We ask: Where were the U.S. state Attorneys General
when they were vilifying American police, firefighter and veterans' charities in the 1990s, and at the same time not
blinking an eyelash at these fraudulent Muslim terrorist charities?
8-15-02:
Scott Speicher, a Navy pilot shot down over
Iraq during the Gulf War, has had his status upgraded by the Navy from KIA to MIA.
| Now that the Taliban is gone |
|
|
| girls can go to school |
| And learn how |
|
|
| to play baseball |
9-5-02:
A Taliban terrorist, a relative of a senior Taliban official, attempts to assassinate
President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan, guarded by U.S. troops, in Kandahar, in broad daylight. He fails, and is shot dead
by Karzai's U.S. bodyguards, but only after the assassin got off two shots missing Karzai by about two inches apiece.
This Association predicted this in our Newstand entry on 7-31-02.
| Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai |
|
|
| has many enemies |
At the same time, Al Quaida terrorists set off a car bomb
in Kabul, killing 60. When it comes to killing innocents, trust us, terror has no shame.
| Afghanistan |
|
|
| and her neighbors |

l
9-8-02:
Vice-President Dick Cheney announces that the USG is "well on its way" in preparing
enough free smallpox vaccines for 350 million doses for bioterrorism attacks. [Ed. note: Readers should not confuse this vaccine
with a cure for those actually infected. The vaccine also has a side effect which will include the death of some of those
innoculated, and will be ineffective in the case of others. Releasing a smallpox virus in America would be one of
the most potentially devasting bioterrorism attacks on the U.S. imaginable.]
"The only way to deal with the terror
threat against the United States, is to destroy it."
- Vice-President Dick Cheney, 5-13-03
| Vice-President |

|
| Dick Cheney |
9-13-02:
Three (in our opinion) creeps, all of them of Arab descent, two of them U.S. citizens,
all of them U.S. medical interns, are overheard making an oral threat of terrorism against the United States at a Calhoun,
Georgia Shoney's restaurant. One of them asks that if Americans are weeping on 9-11-02, what will they be doing on 9-13-02,
while the other two simultaneously engage in a conversation in which it is said that one of them doesn't have enough "to bring
it down," but that they can get it. The threats are reported to law enforcement by a Georgia patriot.
The three are found to have a plate on one of their cars registered to
a man in Chicago who never heard of them.
After questioning and refusing to cooperate, they are let go by law enforcement
without any charges filed.
This is outrageous. Whatever happened to John Ashcroft's statement that (in our opinion) bums
like this would be arrested "for spitting on the sidewalk?" In the opinion of this Association, these three men should
have been charged, at a minimum, with felony hoax of terror under Georgia and federal law. They should be prosecuted, convicted,
and given the maximum sentence on each and every count in each jurisdiction, with each sentence to run consecutively.
...And no person, other than a traitor, should ever patronize any of them as a doctor.
The three of them and their, in our opinion, creep lawyer, are reported to have threatened
to sue the Georgia woman who reorted them for slander, not realizing she has immunity for making a police report. Hey,
creeps, Sue us for libel! Bring it on! Truth is a defense to any libel action and, after watching these three on TV,
the visible truth is they've acted instinctively like a bunch of bullies.
On the same date, a U.S. District Court judge dissmisses a USG criminal complaint
against "Benevolence International," a phony charity terrorist front, for perjury. This dismissal is also an outrage.
9-19-02:
This Association needs to do a hard thing and that is to criticize some
of the families who are demanding more from the USG for the loss of their loved ones on 9-11-01.
Here's the math, in simple English: The USG is offering, for every loved
one lost who had, for even one year, a salary of $100,000, a tax-free payment of $3 million. They have to agree not to sue
the government or any U.S. national for their loss. This money comes out of the taxpayers' pockets. Keep in mind that the
American people did not cause 9-11; that the fact a person made $100,000 in one year does not guarantee he would continue
to make that for 30 years (the opposite is more probably true); and that the veterans who put in 20 to 30 years of service
to the Nation at low pay, while they could have been compensated far more in the private sector, don't receive benefits anything
like this offer, if they were compounded into a lump sum payment.
These NYC stockbroker widows need to revisit their demands.
| In simple English, this place is still |
|
|
| run by mullahs who hate the U.S. |


9-29-02:
Iran is now providing shelter for at least one Al Quaida training camp
near Zabul in eastern Iran, near the Afghan border. This story is confirmed by special surveillance means, and is guaranteed
to be 100% accurate.
The current intelligence estimate is that the total dollar cost to Al Quaida
for its September 11 attack on America was approximately $500,000, most of it paid out in cash.
Where did most of that money come from? Usama bin-Laden.
Where does he get his money from? Gifts from his Saudi family.
Where do they get their money from? Saudi oil revenue.
Where does that money come from? Primarily the American automobile owner,
at the pump.
The Democratic leaders of the U.S. Senate are still, as of this date,
holding up approval of the excellent U.S. House of Representatives Homeland Security Bill on one issue, union representation
for federalized homeland security workers.
The details of the House Bill as passed:
MAJOR AGENCIES TRANSFERRED TO HOMELAND SECURITY
* Coast Guard (USNVA opposed, we believe USCG should be part of DoD)
* Customs Service (USNVA supported; reforms also necessary)
* Border Patrol (USNVA supported)
* FEMA (USNVA supported)
* Secret Service (USNVA supported)
* TSA (USNVA supported; funding and airport security policy reforms badly
needed)
WORK FORCE FLEXIBILITY
* Emphasizes worker performance and accountability
* Permits broader job classifications and pay scales
* Allows waiver by President of union rights for national security
(USNVA took no position; compromise possible on certain rights and/or types of workers)
* Left intact existing provisions for civil rights, disabilities, age discrimination
and whistleblowing
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
* Exempts from Freedom of Information Act new information about vulnerabilities
provided to the Department by people and businesses
PRIVACY
* Bans national identification cards or drivers licenses (USNVA strongly
supported)
* Bans federal programs that could encourage citizens to spy on each other
(USNVA supported)
* Creates high-level privacy officer to safeguard civil liberties
OTHER ISSUES
* Provides liability protection for companies involved in homeland security
work (USNVA supported; part of necessary U.S. tort reform)
* Moves INS processing functions to the Justice Department, but keeps issuance
of visas to foreigners at INS within State, but with greater input by Homeland Security (Complicated, but part of a necessary
toughening of the INS visa granting and maintenance process)
* Establishes Homeland Security Research Center at one of the national
laboratories
For more USNVA positions on Homeland Security, including thins that are
left out of this and other pending legislation and should be included, see the chronological news entries on this Newstand.
10-1-02:
Drug Gang terrorists shut down most of Rio de Janeiro, threatening
local businessmen with death because of a recent police drug crackdown.
An anti-American socialist, "Lula" da Silva, is poised
to take over Brazil as president in upcoming elections later this month. If polls are correct, it will be the first time since
1964 that Brazil will be ruled by an anti-American administration.
UPDATE 2-28-03:
As we implied in our original piece, with
the election of Lula, the drug situation grew dramatically worse in Brazil. As of this date, during Mardi Gras in Rio, drug
gangs have murdered at least 10 people, singling out naval officers for death; blown up public transportation buses; and shot
up the whole city, all in response to a local police force which has refused to buckle under and accept more bribes from the
druggies to look the other way. THIS CAN HAPPEN HERE, and in certain cities in America, the part about bribes, it already
has.
All drug dealers are terrorists, and it's
about time local American officials, especially those from neighborhoods where drugs are rampant, said so. WE ARE.
President Bush, and America, have a serious
problem coming up with the Lula regime in Brazil in the next 4 years, with Lula's anti-American, pro-Castro, pro-Chavez in
Venezuela, and pro-leftist personal feelings. If the Soviet Union had still been around, he probably would have invited them
to open a few bases in Brazil by now.

The drug dealing gangs of Los
Angeles, as of 2003, not only murder 300 Americans per year in that city, they also shoot another 2,000. They boldly proclaim
in their graffiti, as evil politicians proclaim everywhere, that they are in charge of the city, and that they own the streets.
10-12-02:
Ayman Al Zawahiri, bin Laden's right-hand man, apparently still alive, announces
as reported on Al Jazeera TV that Al Quaida is still targetting the "destruction of the American economy."
Terrorism, and the threat of terrorism, is, in the opinion of the Association, the
primary reason for the weakening symptoms in the U.S. economy since 9-11. But USNVA also says this; and we say it loud and
we say it clear: These symptoms have more to do with the fear of the American people than they do with the real power of Al
Quaida and, as to the fundamental strength of the American economy, no American has anything to fear except fear itself.
No American should blame these symptoms on President Bush, or on his military efforts
to stamp out the terror threat wordwide. Nor should they be blamed on our active-duty military called to defend the nation,
or on our veterans, or veterans' groups. Real Americans should place that blame for these symptoms where that blame really
lies, and come to the assistance of their country in this hour of need.
...That assistance means, regardless of whether you're a large, small, or institutional
investor, buying stocks in America, not selling them.
...That assistance means helping veterans' and military groups who ask, without complaining
about the temporary deflation of one's stock portfolio.
...That assistance means continuing support for the War on the Terror which is aimed
at every American.
Don't get us wrong: Zawahiri and his pals still retain the power to carry out great
harm to the American economy...but only if we, as Americans, let them.
...Remember, Patriot, that it is not Usama bin Laden who is buying and selling stocks
on the New York Stock Exchange or on NASDAQ.
| 10-12-02: |
|
|
| Still vows to destroy the United States |
10-16-02:
Islamic Jama'a, an Al Quaida affiliate in Indonesia, sets off
a series of car bombs on the tourist island of Bali, killing hundreds of westerners, mostly Australians.
Bali is a tourist mecca where one can live and eat in a luxury hotel for $20 a day, and a financial mainstay of the Indonesian
economy. The success of this attack implies more Al Quaida attacks wordwide against the softer target of western tourism.
Also see our 1-9-02 WOT commentary on Indonesia.
[UPDATE 9-10-03:
An Indonesian court sentences the chief executive planner of the Bali
bombing, Imam Sumudra, to death by firing squad. Sumudra had screamed at his trial that he was a martyr, and that no real
Muslim would ever be sorry for killing Americans, all of them. At his sentencing, he screamed at the brave court that they
would all "roast in hell."]
10-23-02:
[From Association police and military sources]:
John Allen Muhammad, a.k.a. John Williams, a Louisiana native, and a young
Jamaican-born associate, John Lee Malvo, who frequently posed as Muhammad's son, are arrested as the greater D.C. area
snipers.
Muhammad, a follower of the Nation of Islam who had served as a security guard
for Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, was also a 10-year Army veteran (expert rifleman, qualifying with the M-16) who
served in the Gulf War. He frequently had verbally attacked the Bush Administration for sending U.S. soldiers to the
Persian Gulf to attack Islam and, along with his associate, had expressed sympathy for the 9-11 terrorists. Both he and Malvo
often loudly played rap music which lyrically endorsed murdering American police officers.
The victims of the D.C. sniper over the preceding 21 days were from all races,
national backgrounds, religions and ages, including children.
The sniper had demanded $10 million to stop killing people.
There is no evidence officially linking Muhammad or Malvo to Al Quaida.
[All of us should keep in mind that Timothy McVeigh was also an Army veteran of
the Gulf War who carried out terrorism because national policies were not right-wing enough for him. War, and the trauma war
brings, does horrible things to people, all people who live through it.
None of these words are meant to excuse or justify, to any degree, the murders
carried out by these particular individuals.]
UPDATE 11-17-03: A Virginia jury, using Virginia's antiterrorism
statute, convicted Muhammad this date of conspiracy to murder in an act of terrorsim, and later recommended he be sentenced
to death. The statute will definitely be put to the test on appeal. Muhammed still faces posible charges in both Maryland
and federal courts. His accomplice has yet to be tried as of date.
10-25-02:
"America will be eliminated, even if it is decades from
now....Afghan Muslims have betrayed me, like a bunch of women."
- Usama bin Laden, in a purported Last Testament made in December, 2001, in the Tora Bora Mountains of Afghanistan,
as reported by Al Jazeera TV
11-19-02:
The U.S. Congress passes the new Homeland Security Act with the provisions
asked for by the Bush Administration.
These were basically the same provisions passed in the original House Bill,
as posted on this Newstand 9-29-02. The Administration added, however, a Total Information Awareness Program, at an
additional cost of $200 million at the last minute, a program first featured on our Homeport War on Terror Newstand entry
for 2-13-02. Total Information Awareness takes that Transportation Security Agency program for airport security and nationalizes
it, placing it under the DoD.
This Association opposes this program as an invasion of the privacy rights
and freedom of movement of American citizens. The program does not in any way target foreigners, only Americans. It was not
American citizens, or even green carders, who blew up the World Trade Center. It was foreign Muslim males. Targetting the
average American this way, in our opinion, is not only a waste of money which could be spent effectively targetting foreigners;
it also conteracts our freedoms with a brand of Big Brotherism which can easily be found in places like Iraq, North Korea,
Cuba and Iran.
Representative Dick Armey of Texas is to be credited with placing a provision
in the Act banning the creation of a national i.d. card.
The Senate passed the Act without any appropriations , which mean they
actually have to be added next year.
In a related story, the White House and the Justice Department announced
that Justice has begun the random phone monitoring of Iraqi nationals in this country. We point out that our 9-15-01 Recommendations
to the Nation and the Administration #'s 6 and 11 called for the random surveillance of all foreign Arab, Persian and
Muslim males in this country. At least this is a halfway measure to that effect, although more than a little belated.
12-5-02:
This Association has detailed repeatedly on this War on Terror Newstand
going back to our 11-1-01 entry, Saudi and Muslim fundamentalist group funding of terrorism, through U.S. based front charities
soliciting in the U.S. under d/b/a names.
This Association has denounced repeatedly on this same Newstand going
back to our 4-29-02 entry, the efforts of American left-wing politicians making a political mountain out of a molehill, and
using law enforcement as a pawn, to attack U.S. police, firefighter, anti-violent crime, and veterans' charities, as far back
as the 1980s, whom those politicians feared or opposed, while at the same time turning a blind eye to the fraudulent fundraising
of those front charities paying for terrorism against the American people those same politicians were and are paid to protect.
The national news media is only now beginning to report this story
and, even today, you are only beginning to see, in that media, the tip of the iceberg.
Where was that media in the 1980s?
12-11-02:
As Senator Bob Graham, the current Chairman of the U.S. Senate
Intelligence Committee, points out on the PBS-TV Lehrer Report this date, U.S. visa fraud otlaws, all of them foreigners,
are non-extradictable under every U.S. extradition treaty.
Those same treaties provide that almost every U.S. citizen
can be extradicted for anything down to and including jaywalking. What an outrage!
Those treaties need to be re-written to prioritize extradicting
foreigners to the U.S. for terrorism. And the dollar emphasis on all those extradition actions need to be on those foreigners,
not on U.S. citizens. Period. Let's get our priorities straight.
2-7-03:
Counterintelligence sources tell the Association that Al Quaida has
the immediate capability of obtaining dirty radiological devices, chemical and biological weapons and is planning to target
them simultaneously on high level but soft profile multiple targets in Washington, D.C. and New York City.
On the same date Sheik Ahmed Yassin, chieftain of the terrorist group
Hamas ,tells Muslims worldwide to strike at the United States.
The nationwide average price for gasoline goes up to $1.63 per gallon.
The Department of Homeland Security puts the nation on a condition
of high alert, with good cause.
2-10-03:
A 2003 poll caried out by the Department of Justice shows only 49% of Americans even
bother to report to the police serious violent crimes probably, we believe, because they know the local police are not believed
to be credible to "do anything about it."
Read our lips, all you law enforcement types, from AGs to the lawyers who work for them
to the police officers on the beat: There is no moral equation, none whatsoever, between willful and intentional violent crime
carried out by truly bad people, including terrorism and drug dealing, and non-violent crime, and crimes carried out with
less than willful violent intent, on the other hand. One is not "equal" to the other. One type requires, as a national security
measure in 2003, law enforcement prioritization; the other requires less.
You feel differently, and you're elected to office? This Association thinks we need a
"regime change" in your office.
2-11-03:
Usama bin Laden,
confirmed alive by voice impressions, goes on Al Jazeera TV to say that his continued existence proves that Allah is on his
side, and on the side of the destruction of America, or else he would have been killed in the Bora Bora mountains of Afghanistan
and then goes on to give advice to Saddam's Republican Guard to fight house-by-house to the last man in Baghdad if the U.S.
invades Iraq.
We remind the American public of our 16th
and last Recommendation to the Nation, made in the aftermath of 9-11, and found on our 2001 News and Analysis Page. It has yet to be accomplished.
May God Bless America, and may this man, and
all his supporters worldwide, find the hell they truly deserve.
As to our other Recommendations,
#'s 1-14 have, in one form or another, and sometimes only partially, been made part of law or policy. We didn't do too
well on Recommendation #15, however. There have been substantial restrictions and harassments placed on the average,
and law-abiding, American's freedom of movement by the Bush Administration and Congress as a response to 9-11. It's not that
this Association is against a crackdown in support of security against terrorism in our public transportation systems. This
Association supports that crackdown. It's the current shotgun approach, target everybody, if you will, that is so counterproductive,
and a waste of the taxpayers' dollars, as opposed to a rifle-shot approach profiling exactly the groups from which the terrorist
threat emanates.
2-19-03:
Munir el-Moutassadeg, a 28-year old Moroccan, who was
one of a number of Al Quaida operatives who managed Al Quaida bank accounts used to finance the 9-11 attacks, is convicted
by a German court of being an accomplice to murder on over 3000 counts and sentenced to 15 yeras for the crimes, the maximum
under German law. 15 YEARS!!! - A lousy 15 years! - That's about two days apiece for each victim murdered.: This animal,
who smiled and laughed at his sentencing, will be out by the time he's 43 or before, and back in business.
In the U.S., conspiracy to commit murder nets a max of life without parole or,
perhaps, death. Isn't "murder" murder, wherever it's committed in the world? Why should any state, any government, be permitted
to treat those convicted of murder leniently?
2-20-03:
Professor Sami Al-Arian of the University of South Florida is
arrested by federal agents at 5 a.m. in a raid on his Temple Terrace, Florida apartment, on terrorism charges related to his
fundraising for the Palestinian branch of Islamic Jihad. Another lecturer at USF, an associate of Arian's, also was indicted
and immediately fled for the Mid-East. U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft goes on TV to call Arian "the North American
head of Islamic Jihad." For more on Islamic Jihad, see our list of worldwide terrorist groups above on this Newstand.
Bill O'Reilly of FOX-TV's "O'Reilly Factor," and Rush Limbaugh, first broke the story of Al-Arian.
Arian had been suspended with pay ($67,000 per year) as a lecturer at the
University of South Florida because of the physical dangers brought to the campus by his pro-terrorist, anti-Israeli rhetoric.Quite
frankly, we've never understood how suspension with pay for wrongdoing counted as a punishment; it sounds more like a reward. Arian's
teachers' union staged protests and was fighting his suspension in court. Arian's activities had given USF the nickname
in some circles of "terrorist U."
Arian, in self-defense, says he was fundraising in the United States (actually,
he says his wife was the principal fundraiser) for charity to assist "orphans" (read: "terrorists").
USNVA has commented repeatedly on this Newstand about the outrage of U.S. law
enforcement and State Attorneys General, dating back to the 1980's, attacking, vilifying and deceitfully disparaging legitimate
police, firefighter and veterans' groups, while at the same time not lifting one finger against these phony Islamic fundamentalist
terrorist "charities."
UPDATE 2-26-03: FIRED! Without pay.
Sami Al-Arian was fired today by USF. The termination was delivered to him in
his jail cell, the statement adding that he used USF to assist him in raising money for his phony "charities," in funneling
that money to terrorists, and in bringing terrorists to USF in the guise of students.
'Bout time, in our opinion.
UPDATE 7-18-03:
One of al-Arian's phony Florida charities, the Islamic Academy (founded in 1992),
named in the FBI indictment as a terrorist ploy used to bring Islamic terrorist "students" to the U.S., is reported this date to
have regularly received an unaudited $350,000 grant (through another umbrella charity authorized to distribute state funds)
from the State of Florida! This kind of news is outrageous! The government of a U.S. state awarding $350,000 per year to support
anti-American Arab terrorists. That money could have gone to the Florida PBA, PAL, the FOP, the Firefighters, veterans' groups,
or never left the state treasury. And it is not just Florida, trust us, awarding free money to Muslim terror groups disguised
as charities. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
3-10-03:
After suspending elections indefinitely both for the presidency and for the Palestinian
parliament, Yasser Arafat has appointed his own prime minister of an appointed parliament, re-writing
at the same time a Palestinian "constitution" saying the prime minister cannot challenge Arafat on issues of foreign affairs.
This all is long after Arafat promised democratic elections in the West Bank and Gaza, as to both the presidency and the parliament,
elections Hamas was likely to win.
Why has this story not been widely reported in the U.S. mainstream media? What' s the
big deal, Yasser? If the Israelis can have democratic elections, why can't you? Why can't Saddam? Why can't the Saudis, or
the Qataris, or the Kuwaitis, or the Egyptians, or the Yemenis, or the Syrians, and on and on?
If the American hating Islamic fundamentalists were to win all those elections, which
might or might not occur in true democracies, which none of these countries are, this Association believes that would simply
bring more clarity to international affairs between the U.S. and the Arab world, and that clarity would be good, certainly
for the definition of modern American sovereignty, if not for the Arab street: A far better situation, in our opinion,
than the murky world of American involvement with pro-American ( at times ) despots in the Arab world we confront today.
There is nothing wrong with democracy. If a people want to self-destruct, at least let
them vote on it.
3-11-03:
Pakistan has arrested over 400 Al Quaida suspects to date, proving Pakistani President Musharraf's dedication to the War on
Terror, even in the face of a substantial Pakistani public opinion in favor of bin Laden.
Our intelligence sources tell us, credibly in our opinion, that bin Laden
is currently hiding in the Peshawar region of Pakistan, perhaps in Peshawar itself.
There is a sense in intel circles, as of this date, that CIA operatives and Pakistani
intelligence, are closing in.
The sooner, the better.
4-10-03:
Low level fighting, sponsored by the still active Taliban, is beginning to spread in
southeastern Afghanistan recently, killing a number of U.S. troops, primarily because of the age-old Afghan problem, commented
frequently about on this Newstand, of locally perceived corruption in the local warlords. The USG needs to get a handle on
this problem.
The U.S. still has about 8,500 troops on the ground in Afghanistan.
The Karzai government will be up for election in December of this year.
4-11-03:
Intelligence sources confirm to the Association that it is Usama bin Laden's voice
on a recently released Al Jazeera TV videotape urging Muslim suicide bombers to blow up Americans and U.K. citizens in retaliation
for the invasion of Iraq, and for Islamic fundamentalists to overthrow the governments of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bahrain,
Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.
4-14-03:
Is the U.S. about to invade Syria, as has been widely reported?
Probably not, in the immediate future, in the opinion of the
WOT Newstand editors, but intelligence sources tell us President Bush does not like the physical support the Syrian government
has given both Saddam and anti-American Muslim international fundamentalist terrorists in the past. And he doesn't think the
"Syrian story" has been adequately told in the U.S. media.
We agree, on both counts.
Here is the Syrian story:
This is a dictatorship as vile as Saddam's. Whatever their U.N.
Ambassador said to Tim Russert on 4/13, the fact is any Israeli Jew or American Christian who went to Damascus as a tourist
and began openly preaching Judaism or Christianity or pro-Americanism on the street would be arrested on the spot by Syrian
Intelligence and hung as a spy. The same would be true for any Syrian who did the same.
The father of the current dictator, Hafez Assad,
was a common thug who handed power through his grip after death
in 2000 on the Syrian military directly to his son, Bashar Assad, a la an absolute monarchy, which is what Syria is today.
The son's sole qualification to rule a country: he used to be an eye doctor in London.
Under both father and son, Syria keeps alive, through funding,
Hezbollah (see our description of Hezbollah above in our list of major terrorist organizations worldwide). Hezbollah blew
up the U.S. Marine Barracks at Beirut International Airport in 1983, murdering over 200 Marines President Reagan had
sent there as peacekeepers. Syria controls Lebanon today for all practical purposes, wrongfully. Syria hides its chemical
weapons of mass desruction from the public eye. Assad, Jr. put numbers of Syrian suicidalists into Iraq to fight for
the Saddam regime against America.
The Syrian leadership would give their right arm if they could
kill every Jewish man, woman and child, and drive Israel into the sea. Today, Syrian Intelligence funds and supports, in addition
to Hezbollah, both Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
The Bush policy, for the time being, we predict, is simply to
threaten Syria to get it to cooperate more fully in the War on Terror.
If U.S. armored columns reached into Damascus to overthrow Assad,
Jr., many Syrians would welcome them, as many Iraqis welcomed our troops in Iraq.
Assad, Jr. should keep his eyes focused on that fact.
[UPDATE 4-24-03:
Assad, Jr. announces that he has sealed the Syrian border with Iraq, will
not permit any more Saddam government fugitives into Syria, and will turn over those already there to the U.S. We predict
all this, along with continued Syrian support for US measures in the War on Terror, will assuage the USG for the time
being. Secretary of State Colin Powell will shortly visit Damascus, at the demand of the USG, to tell Assad, Jr. exactly what
we want on War on Terror issues. Powell is no wilting violet, by the way, in this regard. For what he told the Government
of Pakistan we wanted from them immediately after 9/11/01, see our 2001 News and Analysis Page.
This Association has said for a long time, and we'll say it again: The
only language a violent thug listens to is the language of violence.]
4-18-03:
We have analyzed on this Newstand, almost to death, the CAPS II program for American airport
security.
We can report here, as part of CAPS II, that as of today American pilots are permitted
to carry firearms in the cockpit, but only on domestic flights.
We don't oppose this measure. We endorse it. But if Congress wanted to tell us on which flights
these guns would be permitted, we'd think they'd prioritize international flights of domestic airlines, not
domestic ones.
5-7-03:
Singapore, in return for its concrete support for America's War on Terror in Asia, as reported on this Newstand,
was granted Free Trade status with the U.S. by President Bush, pursuant to Congressional legislation now letting the President
make that decision executively via fast track negotiating authority. The Agreement with Singapore then simply faces a straight
up or down vote, and a positive vote is expected later this year. Good idea, on both counts.
This Association has never underestood, as a sidebar issue, why U.S. customs duties for returning U.S. citizens,
should still apply to products bought in free trade countries, and there are now three of them, Canada, Mexico and
Singapore. If these countries can export their products here wholesale without tariffs, for retail sale, why should
there be a duty (once the per person duty-free limit is reached) on that same product, just because an American went
there, and bought the same product there as a tourist, and brought it back?
5-11-03:
Al Quaida, using truck or car bombs, blows up portions of two major apartment
complexes for foreigners, and a bulding used by a U.S. corporation, in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia.
Many are killed, around 30 total, including 9 suicide bombers, and 8 Americans, and 200 wounded.
The bombings were planned by Saif el-Adel, currently Usama's 3rd in command, who is being given safe sanctuary
in Iran [See the WOT organization chart for Al Quaida on the Homeport Page.].
Usama bin Laden has not given up on his intention, we assure our readers, to instigate a fanatical
revolution against the House of Saud in Saudi Arabia, and to replace it with a regime to his liking. This is so even though
a recent report of one of the agencies of the U.N. Security Council said that, over the past ten years, the House of Saud
had, in one form or another, donated $500 million to Al Quaida. In fairness, we should mention that making donations,
out of fear of what will happen to you if you don't, is not a motivation unique to the government of Saudi Arabia, or to Saudis.
12,000 American ex-pat workers currently live in Saudi Arabia, primarily working to keep Saudi oil flowing. If
they go, as the USG has advised, along with our troops, the Saudis will be hard put to keep their oil flow mechanism
working effectively, just as Panama is hard put to keep a much more simple operation, the Panama Canal, going effectively with mostly Panamanian workers.
And a successful attack by Al Quaida on Saudi Arabia's largest oil producing facility, we point out, would
probably cause a reduction in oil supplies to the West basically equal to what the entire OPEC oil embargo of 1973 did.
5-11-03:
Well, after we reported on this Newstand in our 6-27-02 story that National Security Advisor
Condi Rice
said, on behalf of the USG, that Arafat 
was stealing
international aid funds designed to build up Palestinian infrastructure for himself, Secretary of State Colin Powell
announced today that the USG would pour $50 million more into the Palestinian Authority. Our NSA Newstand first
told you on 5-12-02 that the Bush Administration would flip-flop on the Palestinian issue, and the
Association has continued to be proven right ever since. We guess, though we don't understand the hypocrisy, that to
protect American national security interests abroad, the U.S. Treasury from time to time has to bribe foreign crooks, although
if that same activity occurred domestically, everyone involved here would go to jail.
Meanwhile, Abu Mazan, the new prime minister the USG imposed on Arafat after Arafat cancelled Palestinian
elections, continues to struggle with Arafat for control of and over the military arms of the Palestinian terror groups we've
named in our Glossary of Terror on this Newstand above. Unless Abu Mazen can effecively restrain all these groups, there
is little chance that the USG roadmap to peace in the Mid-East can be effectively implemented.
5-14-03:
Three days after we reported this story on our 5-11-03 entry above on the House of Saud funding
of Al Quaida via Al Quaida phony charities, NBC-TV Nightly News with Tom Brokaw picked it up and reported it.
You get the news here first!
We report again, as part of this story, on all these phony terrorist charities operating fraudulently here, that
we've seen the USPS, the FBI, the FTC, the Attorneys General of Florida (Bob Butterworth), Washington (Christine Gregoire), California, Pennsylvania, and Illinois (Lisa Madigan), attack for years patriotic police, firefighter and veterans'
charities for "fraud" while at the same time doing nothing, absolutely nothing, about the real fraud of these outrageous,
egregious and murderous Muslim terrorist charities "working to help the needy victims of war in the Mid-East."
5-16-03:
La Casa de Espana, a club for westerners in Casablanca, Morrocco, and a Jewish
and a Belgian club, are bombed by Al Quaida truck and car bombers, killing 41 and wounding 100.
Usama bin Laden hates the Morroccan monarchy for its pro-U.S. stances and the fact it doesn't maintain a
pure and fanatical version of Islam to his liking.
Until we destroy Usama and Al Quaida, totally and completely, we can expect these acts of terror to continue,
wherever Usama can find a target of opportunity to make a statement.
That is his will.
That should be ours.
There have been no terror attacks in the U.S. for 20 months, thanks in large measure to the sometimes
overly tough, sometimes overkill to the point of ineffectiveness, but but by and large effective prevention and preparedness
measures of the Bush Administration.
We have also said here on this Newstand that it may be time for the House of Saud in Saudi Arabia to go.
Maybe it is, in the name of clarity for U.S. national security, but let us make clear at the same time that that subsequent
clarity in the Arab world may mean pro-Al Quaida axis of evil regimes taking over there, and taking over OPEC (minus Iraq),
and, along with Chavez in Venezuela, that axis may then force, out of its innate anti-Americanism, U.S.
gasoline prices at our pumps to jump to over $4 per gallon, forcing us to do something permanently about all these regimes,
just like we did in Iraq.
The greater likelihood is that we would pick them off, one by one, sometimes politically, sometimes clandestinely
and, rarely, militarily, just like we did with the formerly Communist regimes of eastern Europe.
All this will come, at some time.
You heard it here first.
5-19-03:
We haven't done an update on CAPS
II in a while on this Newstand. We have been critical of CAPS II in the past, not for profiling in and of itself,
but for counterproductive profiling and profiling the wrong people. We have never backed away from any of that analysis.
Today, the Bush Administration announced for our
ports of entry, a system Prime Minister Chretien put in place for Canada shortly after 9-11:
INS inspectors may fingerprint any foreigner arriving
here, at will. Up to 23 million foreigners per year may be affected.
We criticize this system, for the same reasons
we criticized the Canadian system previously, though since the U.S. has been a major Al Quaida target, and Canada has not,
our criticism of the new U.S. system is made with less emphasis: Al Quaida, using suicidalists, and like the Mafia of old,
does not choose people who are already "dirty" to carry out their crimes. So running these people's fingerprints, or even
keeping them, means very little, other than as a deterrent to Al Quaida to make sure their suicidalists are "cleaner than
clean," which they can easily do, since theese people did not grow up on the streets of America and therefore have no records
here.
The USG system, like the Canadian one, is going
to depend on the judgment of the individual immigration official. Not every arrivee can be fingerprinted. It would take too
much time. So, it's going to be based on "looks," a word used on tourist matters by one well known travel guide.
So beware if you don't "look" right. Maybe you
should just stay home.
We doubt many terrorists will be captured by this
new plan.
None have to date in Canada, by the same system
there.
5-19-03:
As of today, the Taliban has regrouped, under arms, on the Afghan-Pakistan
border, and its spiritual imam vows that they will fight a guerilla war in Afghanistan "for as long as it takes" to oust the
U.S. and the new regime from power. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld says major military operations in Afghanistan are
over.
5-20-03:
Of the 11,500 Allied troops in Afghanistan
today, 5,000 are in Kabul specifically protecting the central government. 18 months after the fall of the Taliban,
there has certainly not been any economic miracle in the new Afghanistan. Primarily this is because Western aid, as we predicted
on this Newstand earlier, is being stolen by the warlords. 
President Karzai told the warlords today that the central government wanted $500 million from
them immediately in taxes, not the $80 million they have provided so far.
This Association has said repeatedly that Western aid to
Afghanistan requires an army of auditors on the ground to make sure it gets into the right hands. This policy has not been
forthcoming, and we doubt it will be.
EDITORIAL PIECE:
What we're doing
in the Mid-East is this:
We broke up the monolith of the
old Al Quaida organization. We broke up the monolith of the Saddam regime in Iraq. We did both in the name of the War on Terror
and we did so, successfully, and in record time, in both cases.
The problem analogy lies in what
was done on the War on Drugs in Colombia in the 1980s and 1990s: The monolith of both the Medellin and Cali cartels were broken
up, but what sprung up in their aftermath were mini-drug cartels there everywhere, with no noticeable decrease in cocaine
and heroin importation into North America. The USG did not effectively follow through to date in this twilight struggle against
these mini-cartels.
The same thing is happening already
in a Mid-East where mini-Usamas and mini-Saddams are now rising up to move up to replace, and carry on the work of, the old
monolithic organizations.
Our work has just begun. Don't doubt
it, for a second. And our second success, when and if it comes, will be 10 times more difficult than our first.
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon
officially accepts the Bush
Administration "roadmap" to a Palestinian-Israeli peace, which includes the removal of Jewish settlements
in the West Bank,
and in the face of new Hamas terror attacks in Israel.
Brave man! And a new watershed for USG peace policy in the Holy Land.
exists by 2005, and democratic elections were held, as of
today, the terror group Hamas (See above, Glossary of the Major Arab Terror Organizations)
would win, and would carry
out wave after wave of terror attacks in Israel, to push the Jews into the sea, or until Israel re-acted by re-occupying the
West Bank. While it is possible to reconstruct Arab views, for some, about the United States, even Colin Powell cannot talk
the fanatical Arab Muslims, at least for the next 100 years, out of their 'death to the Jews or death to me' beliefs.
5-30-03:
The Hamas leadership
puts out a statement in English today, in contrast to what they've said in the recent past, that they are only
enemies of Israel, and not of the United States.
Only an idiot would be fooled by the English language statement of an Arab terror group. What is important, since
these people are gang leaders, is what their message is in Arabic to their followers on the street, and that message has not
changed: " Kill all Jews, Kill all Americans, Kill all Britishers, Kill all infidels."
These people are like Hitler. They'll try to trick, to deceive, the public in any Western democracy 24-7 about
what they're reallty about.
Hamas seeks to push Israel into the sea. The very day after they achieve that, swollen by their self-glory, they
will turn to their international agenda to kill Americans and to achieve their final glory, a world Muslim fundamentalist
state, a 'Caliphate state.'
This is not the old Algerian FLN France was dealing with in the 1960s, which just wanted independence and nationalism
for their own country against the colonizing power. These people today are truly internationalists, just like the Communists
were; they have a world vision, and they will not stop until they reach it or, like the Communists, they are irrevocably stopped
instead.
5-31-03:
Pat Buchanan, CNN-TV commentator, says the USG can put in 400,000 U.S. troops to establish
an effective pro-U.S. central government in Afghanistan, or we can have warlordism, or we can have
the Taliban. He's probably right.
Marshal Fazim is the chief warlord today in Afghanistan, but he's pro-U.S., part of the old
Northern Alliance, and effectively controls the northeastern 1/8th of the country.
The USG is most certainly going to go with warlordism, and try to manage it.
6-1-03:
The Bush Administration will work, we are told by our sources in the Administration, personally and specifically,
from now until Election Day 2004 at a minimum, to minimize Yasser Arafat in the eyes of his Arab former partners, and to maximize
Palestinian prime minister Abu Mazen among the same, for the sake of the success of the USG's Israeli-Palestinian roadmap
to 2005.
The success of this strategy is way to close to call at this point, because most Palestinians today, with
or without following Arafat, hate all Jews and all Israelis.
The Administration thinks that building up a 'Third Force,' as a personality, will help, and can turn that
tide. It's an old theory in covert action, and it rarely has worked in the past.
We hope it does.
6-20-03:
Abu Zubair Al-Haili, one of the former top echelon Al Quaida captured in Morocco 6-02 featured on
this Newstand's Homeport Page, has given up a low-level Al Quaida operative in the U.S., a naturalized U.S. citizen originally from
Pakistani Kashmir, who moved here in 1994, and who was living as a HAZMAT truck driver in Columbus, Ohio. He was secretly
indicted, and pled guilty, under the Patriot Act, in April 2003 (as the U.S. Justice Department quite properly proceeded in
this case) to attempting to blow up the Brooklyn Bridge, and to derail at least one major AmTrak train.
Some media believe this arrest and plea agreement are major accomplishments. In some awys they are,
but in other ways they point out the likelihood, as we reported in our opening article at the top of this Page, in 2002, of many other secret Al Quaida sleeper cells still operating in the United States. The facts
of this case also point out Justice's over-reliance on foreign Al Quaida captives to talk, which hasn't produced that
many arrests really.
More needs to be done to "root out" these people here. An ultra-light borne bomb taking out the
Brooklyn Bridge, and a bomb blowing up an AmTrak train simultaneously, could result in 1,000 U.S. deaths.
7-15-03:
NATO will be given, sometime this year, overall command of ISAF
(International Security Force, Afghanistan).
The Bush Administration should be credited for arranging a takeover
of this policing task by an international organization, especially because it serves as a model for what is also accomplishable
in Iraq. However, we need to also report that there is less than meets the eye here since the military commander of NATO must
always be an American; that NATO has no standing army of its own, and that U.S. Forces are the the primary military component
of the Alliance.
There are about 10,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan as of today and , as we
have previously reported, the Taliban is beginning to become militarily resurgent, making bolder and bolder attacks on pro-Western
Afghan forces. U.S. Force figures in Afghanistan need to be doubled. U.S. Forces are good on conventional offensive,
and weak on guerilla warfare defense. The foreign War on Terror requires a new and substantial offense against Islamic terrorists
worldwide. The best defense is a good offense.
7-25-03:
Israel is building a secret fence (not a "wall")
on certain segments of territory in the West Bank, to more effectively keep out Hamas cross-border terrorists (probably a
good idea).
The White House, in welcoming Palestinian prime minister Abu Mazen this
date, speaks out against the idea, and, at the same time has appointed two financial advisors to oversee the new U.S. aid
going to the Palestinian Authority, to make sure it remains in the right hands (not Arafat's).
7-31-03:
An NBC-TV poll released today shows that 66% of
Americans believe President Bush is doing a good job on the War on Terror.
He has a 56% job approval rating overall.
8-4-03:
More money needs to be appropriated for the Air Marshals'
program, and for other aspects of Homeland Security, as U.S. Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) said today, but we ask Senator Schumer, why haven't the Democrats in Congress supported (a) those incresed appropriations
without whining about the size of the deficit and (b) found a way to pay for those appropriations out of all the welfare fraud
that exists at the fedreral level.
Neither (a) nor (b) is being done.
Either one would be a step in the right direction.
Both would be even better.
8-4-03:
U.S. Forces in Afghanistan now number about 10,000,
and the USG says today they will stay there as long as it takes.
The Bush Administration also promises today it will propose $16 billion
for aid to Afghanistan in the 2004 budget. That money is important, we point out, because the central government in Kabul,
as business has been done since time immemorial in Afghanistan, needs it to buy the loyalty of the outlying provinces to the
central and pro-U.S. regime.
So the money is important. But it is equally important to the U.S. taxpayer,
who is footing the bill, that the money gets into the right hands. Some trickle of what are in effect 'block grants' in this
case, always finds its way into the right hands. But merely throwing large sums of money at any problem without specific control
over how that money is spent rarely, if ever, solves the problem effectively.
That has not been done to date.
A U.S. Army perimeter near
Nariz, Afghanistan
As we have previously reported, the Taliban is beginning to become militarily
resurgent in Afghanistan, making bolder and bolder attacks on pro-Western Afghan forces. To make matters worse, one of the
major southern warlords we support is out and out calling for the re-establishment of a "real" Islamic state in Afghainsitan,
the exact same message of the Taliban. U.S. Force figures in Afghanistan need to be doubled, and the political
message of the Karzai government needs substantial strengthening with the warlords. U.S. Forces are good on conventional offensive,
and weak on guerilla warfare defense. The foreign War on Terror requires a new and substantial offense against Islamic terrorists
worldwide. The best defense is a good offense.
8-6-03:
SPECIAL WOT REPORT
TERROR AND TRAVEL
Alright, look, it's about time somebody said so, so this Newstand is.
Ther's enough history gone by since 9-11 to do so.
The anti-American terrorists, other than in the guerilla wars they can
stage in the Third World, which is primarily a military question, target travel, the movement of people, and they target
tourism. That is their M.O. wordwide. They probably don't have the current capability to target more than that, but they could,
if they got their hands on bio-chem or nuclear weapons.
The biggest defiance of them would be to open up our freedom of movement,
of travel, to show we have no fear, and specifically to concentrate the domestic War on Terror on the anti-American
foreigners who threaten that movement.
That is not being done.
It is time it was.
We need to keep up our intelligence, our vigilance and our activity,
at the same time, against those who would set off bio-chem or nuclear weapons against any American target.
8-14-03:
As the Northeast power grid goes
down, we remind our viewers that this Newstand first did a story on these dangers on 2-1-02, found on our Homeport Page.
President Bush repeated our call for grid modernization originally
made that date in his TV Address to the Nation tonight.
8-29-03:
Ansar al-Islam (See our Glossary of
Terrorist Groups above on this Page), using Saddamite fedayeen and Al Quaida operatives, sets off
a huge car bomb immediately outside the Imam Ali mosque in Najaf, killing at least 125 Muslims during
Friday services, including their intended target, the popular 64 year old moderate ("We don't want the Taliban. We don't want
extremism.") cleric, Ayatollah Mohammed Bakr al-Hakim.
Hakim was no pro-American.
The Al Quaida M.O. is all over this attack. They're attacking people they
perceive as moderate, and too friendly to the U.S., since those that fall into that category are not "pure" like they are
in their fanaticism against, and hatred of, anything and anybody who does not subscribe totally to their dictatorial and extremist
vision of the Islamic state. That M.O. was all over, recently, the attack on U.N. HQs in Iraq, which took the life of U.N.
chief in Iraq Sergio de Mello, also perceived as friendly to U.S. interests. They know who they're attacking, and the purpose
is to frighten them.
No Americans were killed or wounded in the Najaf mosque
bombing.
When home-grown terrorists blew up black churches in the American south in
the 1960's, humiliating America as a Nation, we didn't let them get away with it. How much more dangerous to U.S. national
security could it get then when foreigners who advocate the total destruction of the United States by violence, start blowing
up churces abroad they perceive as supporting the cause of America? If 2,000 federal agents could be sent into Mississippi
and Alabama to smother the Ku Klux Klan then, shouldn't we send enough troops to Iraq to smother the terrorists there now?
Anyone who says we "should leave Iraq to the Iraqis," as Hakim
himself said, really means we should leave innocents to be murdered at the hands of animals like those who car bombed the worshippers outside the Najaf mosque.
This war of terror the jihadists fight is a war against civilization itself,
against all the rights Thomas Jefferson proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence that Nature and Nature's God gave
every person, and against all the rights the American people and their Government declared in our Bill of Rights belong
to every man and woman.
9-4-03:
Arafat stages an enormous demonstration in the
Palestinian parliament to oust Palestinian prime minister Abu Mazen. The USG has warned Arafat not to push this.
Our opinion: He will push this. Arafat hates the Jews, hates Israel, hates
the notion of a Zionist state in Israel, and will not, under any circumstances, accept a rival imposed on him in the Palestinian
Authority by the USG.
[UPDATE 9-6-03:
Another correct WOT Newstand prediction
you heard here first. See the full story, and analysis, in our 9-7-03 piece below.]
9-7-03:
In the roughest week yet for the Bush foreign policy (See also our
NSA Newstand) the USG-imposed Palestinian Authority prime minister Abu Mazen
resigns on 9-6-03. Mazen had a popularity of 1.7% among the Palestinian people, according to the latest poll.
The thug Arafat has won once again, within the Palestinian Authority.
The Bush Administration's road map to an Israeli-Palestinian
peace is in tatters, in our opinion.
In numerous stories on this Newstand, we said we doubted it would
work, but would support it anyway. We wanted to give peace a chance. We still do. But, in fact, the jihadists hate the Israelis
too much for it to work, a hatred based simply on who the Israelis are, not what they do, and the jihadists are a majority
among Palestinians and, probably, among all Arabs. Secretary of State Colin Powell this date, for example, along with this
Newstand, calls Hamas "terrorists" (ABC-TV News' "This Week with George Stephanopoulos"), but the fact is, if free and fair
elections were held in Palestine today, Hamas would win overwhelmingly, and Hamas says it's more than ready to go.
Arafat understands the jihadists. He is their man, the man of
terror.
The only solution... the only solution... the Klansmen of the
jihad truly understand, in our opinion, is a military one.
People who hate you because of who you are, as opposed to those
who merely hate what you do, as in the jihadists vs. the Israeli Jews, or the North Vietnamese Communists vs. the United States,
generally negotiate with you, if at all, as the French international affairs analyst Professor Raymond Aron pointed out in
the 1950's, merely out of deception. After they've won the negotiation, they then quickly go back to trying to kill you.
9-9-03:
The U.S. Senate begins raking the Bush Administration
over the coals for its supplemental request of $87 billion for the War on Terror in Iraq and Afghanistan, even though the
entire Senate knew long ago it was coming.
Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) was the most aggressive today,
asking, at one point ,Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, "When will we know we have succeeded and no longer need to
support Iraq financially and militarily?"
Here's how we would have answered that question:
' The real threat of the Soviet Union to the United States lay
not in its ICBM's, although those provided the backbone to that threat, but in the political popularity of international communism
worldwide among anti-American leftists, just as the real threat of the anti-American Jihad lies not in the dirty nuclear devices
they're trying to acquire, nor in the aircraft they might hijack, but rather in the political message of terror they spread
to their fellow travellers worldwide. Both threats were equal, and both threats were real; one is still real.
It took us 45 years to unequivocally prevail over Soviet Communism.
We're not intimidated by you, Senator, or by the argument for
withdrawal you rather artfully pose as if it were a question, probably designed primarily to appeal to the anti-war constituency
in your home state. You were one of the primary advocates for appeasement of the Soviet Union during the heyday of the Cold
War.
We don't know how many years we'll be in Iraq.
We do know how many years it took to defeat the Soviet Union
and this threat is just as real. To have overthrown Saddam, and to leave behind a government which re-seizes Iraq as a terrorist
staging ground against us is a failure, just like losing China, losing Cuba, and losing Vietnam, were failures in the war
against Soviet Communism.
However many years it takes should be the answer to your question,
Senator, the only answer.'
9-11-03:SPECIAL REPORT
Paul Schmidt of Milwaukee e-mailed the War on
Terror Newstand the following questions:
IS THERE A DOOMSDAY SCENARIO FOR
THE WAR ON TERROR?
DO YOU THINK IT WILL HAPPEN?
We're happy to answer.
No, we don't think it will happen.
A poll put ot yesterday by the Program on International Policy
Attitudes at the University of Maryland indicates by a 2 to 1 ratio the American people feel that the current American
military presence abroad increases the likelihood of terrorist attacks on the United States. While that may be true for the
short term, our Newstand staff believes that exactly the opposite is true for the long term, that the only permanent solution
to the jihad terrorist threat to the U.S. lies in the permanent military destruction of their bases abroad.
So, if there is such a scenario, we think it would go something
like this:
The U.S. Congress refuses to vote additional spending for American
dominance in the reconstruction of Iraq, just like they refused further appropriations for Vietnam or for the war on the Sandinistas.
The American people lose the will to fight in Iraq because of
U.S. KIA's of 2-3 per day, causing the USG to pull out all our troops.
Ansar al-Islam and Shi'ite militants then take over Iraq shortly
thereafter, and turn it into a staging ground for jihadist terrorists aiming themselves at the United States.
Emboldened, the Shi'ite mullah junta in Iran announces it has
nuclear weapons and will use them if threatened by the U.S. or its allies. Both Pakistan and India begin to diplomatically
sidle up to the Iranians in South Asia. Russia says, and does, nothing, as the Muslim Chechens step up their attacks there.
A resurgent Taliban attacks in Afghanistan and the American people,
already having lost their will to fight in Iraq, demand a pullout from that country also, permitting the Taliban to take over,
and turning the place, again, into a staging ground for Al Quaida.
South Korea, feeling the heat, opens re-unification talks with
Kim Il-Jung, reunifying Korea under a Communist led coalition government with nuclear weapons. Japan orders all U.S. troops
to leave its soil.
Hamas takes over, in a bloodless coup, the Palestinian Authority
and launches such a human wave assault of suicidalists against Israel that the Israeli government sues for peace, turning
Israel into a "non-Jewish" state and permitting the free return of any Arab. Jews begin to flee Israel en masse for the West.
Jihadists storm into the streets, overthrowing bloodlessly the
governments of Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
Al Quaida acquires dirty nuclear devices and begins to smuggle
them into the United States in suitcases on foreign flights, setting them off in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Miami,
San Francisco and Seatlle, and near major U.S. nuclear installations.
A Tom Clancy novel?
We don't think it's going to happen.
But it's about time a credible organization said what might.
...So we are, and on an appropriate date to do so.
9-18-03:
The USG told cargo and passenger airlines yesterday that they
must randomly inspect a certain amount of freight before it is loaded on planes as part of an effort to close security gaps,
gaps this Newstand first reported to you in 2001.
9-19-03:
The USG announces it has spent a total of $1.8 billion on the reconstruction
of Afghanistan since the Taliban fell.
9-23-03:
Big day at the U.N. General Assembly on the War on Terror, with mutually incompatible
words and philosophies on international order flying:
President Chirac of France: 'No country can ever act unilaterally.' This Newstand staff totally disagrees,
and will continue to. Any government that feels otherwise should be shoved out of our way. Chirac is a political liar and
a political hypocrite: what he really wants is simply to diminish the role of the U.S. in world affairs, while his government
acts unilaterally every day of the week in asserting its role to lead the European Union and to do as it wishes to protect
French commercial interests in francophone Africa and its colonialized territories in Tahiti and the Caribbean.
The mark of every great nation is that they never put their affairs in the hands of others.
Kofi Annan, Secretary-General of the U.N.: Basically repeated Chirac's philosophy. Our response: Same as
above.
President Bush: Attempted to make vague Chirac's and Annan's remarks, but put forward the USG's position
on the War on terror. He also added that the U.S. has an undying "commitment" to the U.N., a position never put forward in
the Reagan Administration and a postion this Newstand sees no need to put forward today for appeasement of this international
house of pancakes. Bush's speech was met with stony silence by the General Assembly representatives.
Will the U.N. finally join President Bush to activate an international War on Terror?
Nope.
A poll out today shows Democratic challenger Wesley Clark beating President Bush in a two-way race.
10-3-03:
A constitution has been proposed by an Afghan legislative committe for Afghanistan.
It would make Afghanistan an Islamic republic, with a directly elected president, with a lot of "on paper"
executive power, and no prime minister.
The hand of the Bush Administration can be seen in the draft, accepting the old argument put out by Chairman
Mao and others, that some societies in Asia were just so chaotic by nature that any government without a very strong executive
at the top was bound to fail.
But you can have all the constitutions you want on paper. In Afghanistan , and in Iraq, it's what happens
on the ground that really counts.
10-3-03:
IS THE FOREIGN POLICY DEBATE ABOUT WHAT TO DO
IN IRAQ AND THE WAR ON TERROR ABOUT BUSH?
Fundamentally, no, it's not.
It's about our long-term policies in the Arab world vs. comparisons
as to what happened in Vietnam.
We are involved, as George Will says, in a true civil war in
the Arab world, between moderate Muslims on the one side, and anti-American fundamentalist, and terroristic, jihadists on
the other.
We were involved in a civil war in Vietnam between Communists
and nationalists seeking to unify a country on one side, and pro-American capitalists and the South Vietnamese military on
the other side. The Communists won.
The comparisons end there. The North Vietnamese Communists had
neither the will nor the resources to carry their war directly to America.
9/11 says that the anti-American jihadists have exactly that
will, and that capability. We are not talking about Israel here, we're talking about US.
The anti-Israeli jihadists in Palestine may not have the power,
as Colin Powell says, to drive Israel into the sea. But, by being able to say they can blow up anybody anytime in Israel indefinitely,
they have already destroyed Israeli society as the Israelis have previously known it.
They can do the same thing here if we show weakness, if we do
not take this war now, no matter how long it takes, no matter what the cost, to them. The best defense is a good offense.
Saying there hasn't been an attack recently on our soil, so we ought to forget about it, is like whistling while
walking through your own graveyard.
Both Vietnam and the War on Jihadist Terror were and are civil
wars. Vietnam was winnable, though the threat of losing it was not the same to us as the the threat of losing the latter is.
Many, if not most, of our politicians, in their rush to greedily harvest what they perceive as a new anti-war vote, miss
the latter point.
10-7-03:
The U.S. has requested NATO send more troops to Afghanistan.
Currently non-U.S. forces in ISAF (International Security Forces, Afghanistan) number 5,500, U.S. forces about 11,000. ISAF
is under SHAPE, the military arm of NATO, whose Commander is, and always has been, an American. The USG would like to at least
double the non-U.S. contingent of ISAF.
Meanwhile, there are signs the Karzai central government in Kabul
is fracturing because Tajik Northern Alliance leaders are saying they may not support Karzai, a Pakhtun, in next year's presidential
selection.
ISAF is doing better in fighting the newly resurgent Taliban
in Afghanistan than U.S. Forces are in fighting their opponents in Iraq. In our opinion this is because, to date, Taliban
fighters have chosen to openly mass and attack U.S. or pro-U.S. Afghan forces, always suffering defeat and casualties in the
process, as opposed to the tactics employed by the enemy in Iraq, firing RPGs at a convoy and then running away.
The situation in Iraq is different from Afghanistan militarily.
U.S. Forces in Iraq are getting "picked off" there because of their high visibility in conducting policing patrols the Iraqis
themselves should have responsibility for, policing patrols U.S. Forces are not good at because primarily they are infantrymen,
not MPs or guerilla fighters, a subject frequently commented on Association Newstands. The good news for the Bush Administration
in Iraq is that it may not be as bad as it sometimes looks; that Americans at home are primarily concerned with U.S. casualties
and, if those come down and, as we expect is more than possible with international force and Iraqi assistance, a pro-American
but democratic Iraqi government in Baghdad takes hold, then the ultimate result can still be said to be: "Mission Accomplished.'
10-22-03:
AN UP TO DATE ON THE WAR ON TERROR
-by Donald Rumsfeld
SecDef Donald Rumsfeld has writtena memo outlining in pithy terms
things this Association has been saying for a long time on this and our National Security Newstand.
- The madrasas in the Muslim world are turning out anti-American
terrorists worldwide much faster than we're killing them. This Newstand, going back to the start of the War on Terror, identified
the madrasas as the primary source of this problem.
- The War on Terror, including stabilization efforts in Afghanistan
and Iraq, is eventually going to cost us hundreds and hundreds of billions, compared with the terrorists' ability to fight
us for a long time by merely spending millions.
- The USG has not yet made "truly bold moves" in the War on Terror
abroad.
- We are in for "a long, hard slog" in both Afghanistan and Iraq.
(Attacks in Iraq against U.S. forces there are now up to 35 a day.)
- We need a new counter-guerilla force to fight terrorists. The
institutionalized Armed Forces are suited to fight conventional wars, not guerilla conflicts. (This has been true, we add,
since President Kennedy first created the Special Forces in 1961. The idea, while it had its plus moments, never really got
off the ground.)
11-29-03:
A Kenyan panel of judges acquits five Al Quaida affiliate suspects of blowing up an Israeli hotel
in Mombasa last year.
An outrage, is our opinion, and it should say something about Kenya.
Three of the five were re-arrested by the Kenyan police after the acquittal on lesser charges.
Prime Minister Sharon of Israel this date says Israel is willing to concede West Bank territory
to the Palestinian Authority for a new state. Sharon's patience in the face of renewed, and bloodier than ever, terrorist
attacks on Israeli civilians on Israeli soil, and his continued willingness to compromise with these thugs, is truly breathtaking,
and in no way reciprocated.
21/1/2003:
Following through on one comment we made peviously on this Newstand
refecting high level analysis this Associaton received from Army sources about the ability of current U.S. Forces in Afghanistan
and Iraq to dominate fixed piece battles with the enemy in both countries, as opposed to waiting for them to ambush and pick
off our soldiers and then run away, both the Army and Marine Corps, in both countries, are clearly, and for that reason, picking
up the notion of forcing, at a time and place of our choosing, those sorts of battles.
12-5-03:
Recent global surveys show that a majority of people even in
historically friendly nations consider the United States to be at least as big a threat to world peace as Al Quaida.
Many of these people are, in our opinion, in denial about terrorism
- until terror is directed at them. Other nations cynically stand aside while the U.S. bears the political and military burdens
of fighting terrorism. They are happy, in their parochial jealousies, to have the world's greatest power brought down a peg.
Indiscriminate terror attacks , in our opinion, imperil all
of civilization, and not just the United States. President Bush has tried to make that case for the past two years.
We hope he continues to try to make it.
12/11/2003:
Both this Newstand and the VI Newstand have reported to you as to foreign judicial
cases of terrorists tried in other countries.
Today, a German judge-run court acquitted a known Al Quaida suspect of terrorism,
because USG intelligence could not pinpoint him as a culprit in a murderous assault.
We bring you these stories not to be legal beagles. We bring you these stories
because we believe these foreigh governments manipulate their internal judicial systems in ways the USG does not and cannot,
for political movements of the moment. That is clearly meant by this Association as a comment on the polirical, and therefore
unfair, nature of their curent judicial processes.
This German political decision was ridiculous. The murderer walked away from
the courtroom with a huge smile on his face, speaking to his people that they should all rise up against America and Americans.
This guy murdered others. Period. To let him go, scot-free, is a travesty
against justice everywhere and a travesty in the face of all the victims who were murdered at the World Trade Center, including
the German citizens who were murdered there.
12/17/03:
Was Saddam in charge of terrorist activities against U.S. Forces after his regime
fell?
Our intelligence sources tell us: no, not really. Not in any operational sense,
where he was directing overall strategy or in planning specific tactical attacks. He was too busy hiding to do either of those
two things.
More importantly, though, he served as a rallying point for those terrorists,
especially for the Ba'athist terrorists, an anti-American strongman, who would come back, a la Napoleon after Elba.
But that is not all good news for Americans. His capture means many anti-American
non-Ba'athists may now feel better about militaril;y joining the anti-American terrorsim in Iraq.
We never said on this Site that America's War on Terror abroad would end with
the capture or killing of any particular foreign terrorist leader. In fact, we said the opposite: the history of these people
is that when one of them is "neutralized," thousnads more spring up instantaneously, out of Islamic fundamentalism, to try
the replace the departed. This is a long-term war, and America better get that straight; it's not the Vietnam war; it's more
like the 100 Years' War between England and France in the 15th Century, and America will have to steadfastly stay the course
if it seeks ro win, to dominate the situation, and to prevent further murderous Islamist attacks on American soil.
In that war, we should ask foe the support of others.
But we should never ask for their permission.
12/25/2003:
Islamic terrorists murder four innocent women and children in Tel Aviv.
These people, the "soldiers of Hamas and the Palestinian Jihad," as Democratic Presidential candidate
Howard Dean called rhem, currently are attempting about 35 suicide bombings per month in Israel.
Islamic terrorists also missile attacKed the Green Zone, the HQS of U.S. Forces in Baghdad, and
also where German, Turkish and Iranian missions are located, on the same day.
Islamic terrorists attempt to assassinate Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf in Rawalpindi. They
fail, but kill 14 innocent Pakistanis in the process.
All on Christmas Day.
These woedwide co=ordinated attacks remind us that, unlike what some critics are saying, America's
war on terror abroad does not mean going after Usama, and forgetting about Saddam, or vice-versa.
All these people worldwide are equally evil. and they are part of an empire, the "Caliphate State"
notion they have created, albeit for the most part, only in the dementia of their own minds.
This War continues, and it will continue, is our prediction, until one side or the other is left
standing and the other side, not.
In simple English, we stand for Freedom, and they stand for an evil empire.
And we need to get it on.
We need to follow through.
As we have seen on this Newstand previously, Musharraf has been a staunch ally of the U.S. since
9/11, and has made great strides in Pakistan against domestic terrorists there, BUT, much remains to be done. The terrorists
believe that, if they can kill Musharraf, they will frighten whoever takes over into reversing Pakistan's course. Pakistani
Islamist militants garnered 11% of the last parliamentary vote, but control one third of the seats in Pakistan's parliament,
inder what is called "propoprtional representation." Musharraf needs to worry about enemies in Pakistan's intelligence service
who are providing information to the Islamist anti-Amercan militants.
12/30/2003:
Following up on our 9/11/2001 Recommendations to the Nation for more air marshals, DHLS requires
certain countries to require armed U.S. air marshals on their planes flying into the U.S., on a case by case basis.
Good job. The British government announced the same day they will place their own sky marshals on
their own international flights.
1/5/2004:
The Loya Jirga proclaimed its new constitution for Afghanistan today.
Afgahistan will be an Islamic Republic, with an elected president with strong powers on paper, a
rwo house elected parliament, equal rights for men and women, and elections within six months.
This is a huge symbolic victory for the Bush Administration in its efforts to bring democracy to
the Islamic world, symbolic only in the sense the Afghans are not Arabs, and it is among the Arabs that the real problems
for the U.S. lie.
1/27/2004:
As of today, the United States has suffered 107 KIA's in Afghanistan.
2/29/2004:
The U. S. Supreme CouRt has agrreed to review the case of Jose Padilla, imprisoned U.S. cItizen,
as an enemy combatant.
We brought you the facts of the Padilla case earlier on this Newstand. He was arrested abroad and
accused of conspiring with Al Quaidist to try To bring a "dirty bomb" into the U.S.
The Justice Department claims two rhings Padilla is contesting. They claim they don't have to give
him a lawyer (though they have, grudgingly) and that they can hold him indefinitely without trial. Padilla says they cannot,
not in the case of an American citizen.
The Justice Department now seems resigned to let the Supreme Court decide this all as a test case.
3/1/2004:
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, who represents the most right-wing government, and the most anti-Arafat
government, in Israeli history, is formulating a new concept for Israeli security, and for the continued existence of the
State of Israel in the Middle East. Whether he would analyze it this way or not, here's what it is, with our analysis:
1. Build a security fence around specific land areas Israel would claim forever, to keep terrorists
(mostly suicide bombers) out. Our analsis: Workable, in the short term, and working largely, especially outside Jerusalem,
currently.
2. Let the Palestinians have the rest of the contested territories, eliminaring the need for the
military arm of Israel to crush them constantly in their own territories. But over the long term the Palestinians will want
to take over all of Israel, so the Sharon plan delays them, but does not eliminate their ultimate agaenda. This aspect of
Sharon's plan is motivaRed by the Palestinian birthrate (high) vs. the Israeli population growth (low).
The direction of those demographics are not going to change ever, unless Israel welcomes and promotes
every Jew who calls himself a Jew to emigrate into Israel.
Sharon's overall plan is based on the premise that the State of Israel must forever preserve its
identity as the only Jewish and Zionist state, something most Israeli politicians of every party agree with.
Sharon's new concept is set against, however, others in his Likud Party who seek a Greater Israel
where Israeli military might permanently dominates (and perhaps expels) Palestinians living on lands Israel claims.
Our overall analysis: Sharon's new concept will buy Israel a respite in the war on terror urged
by anti-Jewish Arabs against Israel. It will not, however, end that war, because nothing but the latter's ultimate defeat
and destruction, or their ultimate victory, will end their agenda.
3/27/2004: AN APOLOGY
We apologize for the temporary interruption in the flow of news and analysis
on our Newstands.
Site building programs we use are being attacked by hackers traced to
Middle Eastern hard drives, causing this temporary interruption in the flow of news, analysis, and other information presented
on our Site.
The existing content of the Site has not been affected, and there
is no way a virus can spread to your computer simply from viewing the Site, or even downloading a portion of the Site.
In the meantime, while we are rebuilding and strengthening the firewalls
on these programs, the NSA, WOT and VI Newstands will continue to bring you analysis pieces on the Homepage Forum, which is
not affected.
We will straighten this problem out and we will be back up and running
with normal operations ASAP.
4/8/2004: WHO IS AL-SADR, AND WHAT KIND OF A
THREAT DOES HE POSE TO US?
Moqtada al-Sadr, 30 yeras old, is an Iraqi Shiite imam. He is
violently anti-American. He controls a large slum, his home base, in Baghdad, called Sadr City, formerly Saddam City, with
an army of thugs about 10,000 strong there, who will fight to the death to save him. Sadr is probably responsible for at least
100 of our KIAs in Iraq. If we leave Sadr alone, he will interpret that as U.S. weakness and stir up more trouble against
us. If we kill him, we will probably martyrize him, which will stir up more trouble against us.
The Newstand Editorial Staff's opinion is : Kill him.
In Iraq, as throughout the Arab world, to show a sign of weakness,
is just to make yourself more prey.
The terrorsit jihadists understand that. They counted on that
weakness on 9/11. They count on it today. Sadr counts on it for his final victory over the United States.
We have no choice. We wish we did, but we do not, not with these
animals.
We either destroy them, all of them, inside their countries or
they will turn our domestic democratic societies in the West, our infrastructures, into rubble, gradually, through terrorism,
one by one, starting with Israel. That is the real War on Terror.
It does not matter whether the President is George Bush or John
Kerry. Neither of them can change what we have said. Nor can anyone else.
Sadr is the newest threat of Islamic terrorist jihad. Do not
believe his lies, that he just wants to be left alone in Iraq, for he is a born liar. The only peace people like him seek,
in the final analysis, is the peace given when everyone who disagrees with their notion of the Caliphate state is dead.
On 4/5 Sadr's Sunni militant friends, after killing and mutilating
four American contractors there, took over Falluja, with a force of at least 10,000 armed effectives. Sadr called on
them to join with him kill the Americans, and to form a united, and anti-American, Iraq, presumably with him in a position
of authority.
On 4/6, Sadr took over the holy city of Najaf. He took over
all the police stations, capturing police cars and bullet proof vests. As of today, he is hiding there, protected by a force
of about another 10,000.
On 4/6, he took over Kut, and probably has another 10,000 armed
terrorists there.
On 4/6, his forces caused uprisings in Basra and Nasiriya.
Al-Sadr's forces took over Kufa and Karbala on 4/7, and he probably
has another 10,000 armed combat effectives in each one of those cities.
His black-covered armed militia is called the Mahdi army. "Mahdi'
means "the promised one" in Arabic. The Mahdi army is assisted by elements of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard provided by
the Shia mullahs who run Iran.
Our intelligence sources estimate 20% of the Iraqi Shiites totaly support Sadr.
UPDATE 4/12/2004:
The U.S. Army Command, Iraq, has promised that
the U.S. will show "overwhelming and decisive" force in dealing with the terrorists in Falluja and the Mahdi army.
As of today, Monday, 4/12/2004, U.S. force shown
has been neither overwhelming nor decisive.
The reason for that is there aren't enough of those
U.S. Forces. Never mind the armchair generals, or whatever our detractors are calling us today, a nine-year old child
could do the math. Of 135,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, less than 98,000 are probably true combat effectives, and maybe less.
There is a question, even, given the numbers of armed effectives the Sunni terrorists have in Falluja, and the combat effectives
of the Mahdi army, whether the U.S. Forces even equal their number.
4/9/2004:
Our analysis of National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice's testimony
before the 9/11 Commission yesterday:
By and large, she did a good and accurate job, in the face of harrassive
and at times outrageous questions from lawyers who really represented a partisan agenda:
She pointed out the salient fact that no piece of intelligence received
by the White House could have prevented or changed 9/11.
No piece of intelligence received by the Roosevelt White House would
have changed Pearl Harbor.
There was one fact brought out by her questioners, however, which reinforces
something we've beeen saying on this Newstand since 9/11:
The FBI field offices were not adequately tasked to take on the terrorist
threat. They were then, and are now, tasked to take on a lot of other less important crimes. They are still not adequately
taked by the DOJ to take on the domestic terrorist threat today.
That means resources. That means too many resources assigned to less
important crimes, and not enough resources assigned to real, and foreign, terrorism, and by "terrorism" we do not mean a vague
phrase which encompasses every sort of crime.
We said that back then.
We're saying it again today.
4/9/2004:
The Iraqi security force may be 200,000 strong on paper, but it's proven
next to worthless on the ground so far.
When confronted with real riot-type terroris trouble, many of them have
simply run away.
We need to do something about this force , and we need to do it now.
4/13/2004:
In the testimony of former Attorney General Janet Reno before the 9/11
Commission, she said, in large part, about the FBI, that it could not keep track of the information it received. (True then;
true today.)
We are reminded by her remarks of our comments on intelligence
gathering and analysis on this Newstand in 2001. We've left them up there all this time in the left margin devoted
substantially to favorite quotations, so you can read them there if you wish, but we'll also repeat them here:
And we also point out a very common problem... the NSA can intercept
every telephone call in the world if they want, but if there aren't enough analysts to read real time every bit of that raw
data (physically impossible) and then, and simultaneously, pass the items of importance on to an intelligence disseminator
to make sure it gets to the right political decisionmaker immediately (bureaucratically impossible), the mere acquisition
of that raw data wasn't worth very much in the first place. The USG and its Intelligence Community have got to
work harder to get closer to those "impossible" goals.
Former FBI Director Louis Freeh, on the same date, testified before
the same Commission that he had asked Congress for more anti-Terror agents in 2000, and was not granted them. (True.)
But, more importantly for Freeh, current Attorney General John Ashcroft and current FBI Director Robert Mueller, and
none of them get this, is that, if you ask for the manpower, by definition you need it, on that priority and, if the people,
through their elected representatives in Congress, don't give you that manpower, you as an administrator, as part of your
responsibilities, need to shift manpower from less important subjects. (Let's be specific: Like bank robbing, fraud, internet
crimes, identity theft, boyfriends' taking their mature girlfriends across state lines, "abductions" by non-custodial natural
parents, self-defense homicides of "victims of crime," where the "victim" had a prior rap sheet for violent and drug crimes
a mile long, etc., etc., etc. It was more important, both in the time frame Director Freeh speaks of, and today,
to capture or kill the likes of Sheikh Yassin or Abdul Aziz Rantisi of Hamas, then it ever was to capture or kill Whitey Bulger.)
It was and is the resonsibility of these named gentlemen, and no one else's, to put those very same resources
on the real violent criminal threat to America: violent foreign terrorism.
We don't think Janet Reno or Louis Freeh ever got that.
We don't think John Ashcroft or Robert Mueller gets that today.
We don't think anybody who doesn't get that is fit to be Attorney General or FBI Director.
The problem is not lack of money. the problem is the lack of administrative priorities amongst the
money which is available.
4/13/2004: TROOP LEVELS IN IRAQ
Command in Iraq has formally requested 14,000 more men. That's about one division, or two brigades,
and we assume they mean combat efffectives. (See our previous stories on this subject.)
For those in the know, the request came in advance, not from Command in Iraq, but from the Bush Administration.
The Administration tells Command in Iraq to publicly make that request, and then grants it. By the way, that's the way it
would work in either a Democratic or Republican White House. The only difference is we're the only ones with high level sources
saying so, so you can get the real facts.
We'll repeat again, for those who call us "armchair generals" ("armchair lieutenant commanders" would
be more like it) that both our WOT and NSA Newstands, posted still posted stories on this site, in the immediate aftermath
of the 2003 conventional war in Iraq, saying and predicting specifically, which no other "armchair generals" did, even though
we received pressure from Pentagon sources not to say so, that it would take a minimum of approximately 200,000 U.S. combat
effectives in Iraq for a long time to achieve the stated goals of the Bush Administration for the occupation and reconstruction
of Iraq.
We were the only "armchair generals" to go out on that specific limb.
With thse 14,000 forces, our total U.S. Force strength in Iraq will be approximately 139,000 men and
women.
We're still standing on the limb we went out on back then.
Nobody's cut it off yet.
SOME MORE BACKGROUND:
U.S. troop levels in Iraq today are about 135,000, up from 120,000 recently.
About 18,000 are National Guard (mostly Army) and about 18,000 are Reservists (also mostly Army).
The required tour in Iraq is one year, which will probably shortly go up.
The original USG goal was to reduce U.S. troop levels to 105,000 by July 1, and to 75,000 thereafter.
The notion of needing more U.S. troops in Iraq is demonstrated, in our opinion, by two sine qua
non USG policies, never officially abandoned, and announced at the end of the conventional war: (1) no arms in the private
possession of anyone other than Coalition or Iraqi security forces; and (2) no armed militias. Since the end of the conventional
war, we have not been able to enforce either policy on the ground, at all.
"The War on Terror is like the 100 Years War between England and France."
-USNVA Newstands
"Can you ever win the War on Terror?"
"Yes, we can." -President George W. Bush, News Conference, 4/13/2004
4/16/2004:
STATE TO U.S CITIZENS: GET OUT OF SAUDI ARABIA NOW
All Americans, other than essential State Department and USG personnel officially there, have been
advised by the State Department to leave Saudi Arabia, and not, until a further advisory, to return.
UPDATE 6/14/2004:
About 30,000 Americans in Saudi Arabia, most working in the oil or finance industries, have
ignored this warning an remained. The reason: money, and their jobs.
If all of them withdrew, in our opinion, the Saudi ability to manage their oil based
economy would falter substantially.
4/23/2004:
Flag draped coffins are secured inside a cargo plane at Kuwait International Airport, for their
return to Dover, Delaware.
Soldiers and civilians take great care with the remains of our military personnel killed in Iraq.
We print this photo here in quiet dignity, to honor our fallen dead in the War on Terror in Iraq.
They died for the Freedom of Man, and that freedom is not free.
4/28/2004:
The USG has
approved U.N. envoy Lakhdar Brahimi, a 70 year old Algerian Sunni Muslim, who worked closely with the Clinton Administration
in its invasion of Haiti, and with the Bush Administration in Operation Enduring Freedom in Iraq, to oversee , for the U.N.,
the new sovereign Iraqi interim government which will take over June 30. Brahimi will, for example, appoint the prime minister,
who has already been selected: his name is Ibrahim Jaffrey, the moderate head of a minor Shia faction, and he will ask for
Coalition forces to remain. There will also be an appointed President, and two vice-presidents, and 25 Iraqi technocrats will
be appointed as the cabinet to the prime minister. Elections for a consultative legislative assembly, which will
have the power to rewrite some of the interim Constitutional provisions originally drafted by the State Department, are
scheduled for January, 2005. Look for anti-Americans to have a majority in that assembly.
A U.S. status of forces Security Council resolution
will be submitted by the USG , for U.S. and Coalition Forces to remain. In many ways , the new Iraqi government
will only have limited sovereignty.
On this same date, U.N. Secretary General Kofi
Annan criticized strongly the rights of U.S. Forces in Iraq to quell murderous anti-American terrorists in self defense in
Falluja. Annan's statements on this date, in the opinion of the Association, were outrageous, wrong and immoral.
4/29/2004:
U.S. Forces are pulling back from the siege of
Falluja, leaving unknown numbers of thousands of Sunni terrorists holed up in the city. Apparently, U.S. Command has worked
out a deal with a former Saddamite general, Lt. General Salah Abboud al-Jabouri, to create a largely Saddamite force, the
Falluja Protective Army, to enter and seize Falluja, a city of about 200,000.
This idea sounds a little bit on the scattered
brain side, if you ask our Newstand staff. Withdrawing from Falluja, as opposed to taking the war to these terrorists in their
kitchen, as the Deputy Director for Coalition activities, U.S. Army Brigadier General Mark Kimmit, once promised, sends a
sign of weakness to these terrorists. It would have been a much better idea to evacuate Falluja, and then to have sent an
overwhelming U.S. Force in to kill the terrorists.
But the worry over casualties has once again won
out.
And we , like everyone else, don't know who or
what the Falluja Protective Army is, or what they're capable of, if they're capable of anything at all.
UPDATE 5/28/2004:
We were totally wrong in our prediction that Jaffrey would be appointed the prime
minister of the new Iraqi provisional government. The new prime minister , accepted by Brahimi today, will be Iyad Allawi.
Here is his profile:
|
|
| Iyad Allawi is one of a US-backed clique
of secular Iraqi opposition figures who lived in exile until the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime in April 2003.
But as a candidate for the prime ministership, he has the advantage - to paraphrase one commentator
- of being equally mistrusted by everyone.
Religious leaders think he is too secular, the US-led coalition now sees him as a critic,
for the anti-Saddam opposition he is an ex-Baathist, while ordinary Iraqis say he is a CIA man.
Born in 1945 to a prominent Shia Muslim merchant family, Mr Allawi trained as a neurologist
and joined the Baath party underground movement as a young man.
But when the party came to power, he fell out with the rising hard man Saddam Hussein in the
early 1970s and was forced to go into exile.
He was badly wounded in an assassination attempt while living in the UK in 1978, believed to
have been ordered by Saddam Hussein.
Well-connected
Mr Allawi went on to co-found the Iraqi National Accord (INA) party, which is known for attracting
disillusioned former Baathists from the military and security fields.
From its foundation in 1991, with the backing of the US Central Intelligence Agency and British
intelligence, the group supported the idea of fostering a coup from within the Iraqi army to overthrow Saddam Hussein, but
its attempts ended disastrously.
Correspondents say Mr Allawi is well-connected politically in Washington and London, has extensive
business dealings and has close relations with Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.
Since joining the US-appointed Iraqi Governing Council, he has publicly opposed the purging
of members of Baath party from government positions.
His work has been focused on running the IGC's security committee, which has been responsible
for building up the new Iraqi army, police and intelligence service.
|
| Dr. Allawi was pushed to the head of the line |
|
|
| by the USG |
5/2/2004:
IF IRAQ DISINTEGRATES, IS THE UNITED STATES
NAVY VETERANS ASSOCIATION STILL OPPOSING WITHDRAWAL?
The Association supported, and does support, the USG effort in
Iraq, on behalf of those Iraqis who believe in Freedom, to establish a democratic and free Iraq.
That effort may fail, because of a determined minority terrorist
element within Iraq, and their friends worldwide, to make it fail through violence.
Our predictions, previously posted, and still posted, on this
site, as to what would happen in such a case, still stand: Utter chaos in Iraq, possibly with the emergence of another anti-U.S.
strongman like Saddam; anti-American Shiite mullahs taking over; a resurgence of the Kurdish independence movement, possibly
requiring the USG to go back in again in support of that movement.
A U.S. withdrawal will produce one or more of these consequences,
as our withdrawal of support for the Shah in Iran during the Carter Administration produced one of the same consequences.
A U.S. withdrawal, unlike Vietnam, in this case, does not end our problems in this neck of the woods with regard to a current
war, in this case, the War on Terror. Such a withdrawal would, instead, exacerbate those problems and produce new ones which,
we also predict, we as Americans will come to rue much more than we regret the guerilla war in Iraq.
This Newstand's Editorial Board, as well as its reporters, do
not know what U.S. Senator John Kerry is talking about specifically when he says that the way out of the mess in Iraq
is "to get the world involved."
If we withdrew, we continue to predict the outcomes we did above.
Withdrawal or not, as a final matter, is a choice for the American
people through their elected representatives to make as policy. It is not a choice for the Association to make.
5/6/2004:
Usama's Most Wanted
Usama bin Laden has offered this date a reward of $130,000 in gold to be paid each for the
murder of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and all "top U.S. officials in Iraq and Afghanistan."
So be it.
5/14/2004
ABU GHURAIB - IN DEFENSE OF OUR TROOPS
Let's get a couple of things straight at the outset:
(1) This Association condemns as abhorrent any torture or murder by USG personnel as a violation
of the Laws of War, and the cases of individuals responsible should be adjudicated under the UCMJ or by U.S. courts of competent
jurisdiction, and justice should be done.
(2) The murderous Islamic terrorists in Mogadishu in 1993 murdered our soldiers, mutilated them,
and then dragged their dead bodies through the streets, even though those soldiers were there as peacekeepers.
The same types of terrorists, motivated by what they claim is religion, in Iraq, have murderously
blown up our soldiers, our innocent young men and women. They have murderously killed, and then mutilated, American civilians,
young men and women, who were there to help them. These terrorists, part of the exact same crowd which murdered 3000 people
on 9/11, in some cases in Iraq burned the bodies of their victims, stamped on them, cut them up, poked them, danced around
them in a savage, sub-human frenzy, and then hung them from bridges. In the case of Daniel Pearl in Pakistan, this same crowd
decapitated him after torturing him first. On or around May 9, Ansar al-Islam terrorists, and their leader, Al Zarqawi, in
Iraq, did the same barbarity to Nic Berg, a kidnapped American contractor. Abu Zawa al Zarquawi is a Jordanian born, street smart, politically savvy
punk, who escaped to Iraq in 2002 and where he became the leader of the Iraqi Al Quaida cell. He was succored by Saddam in
the weak, but nevertheless collaborative relationship Saddam maintained with Al Quaida.
Al-Sadr, the Shiite mullah holed up in Najaf, has offered
a reward for the murder of any member of the Coalition forces, and he includes both Donald Rumsfeld and George W. Bush in
that category.
These Americans we speak of came to bring these people
freedom and abundance, and they were greeted by savages who sought to kill them. We say the hell with the dictatorial nationalisms
of the average Third Worlder, and the hell with their allies, like that California teacher who proudly told John Kerry she
propagandizes "globalism," i.e. the "rights" of cultures different from ours to deny girls an education, to force women to
wear the veil, and to dominate their own societies with a bizarre and inhumane interpretation of religion, to her third
grade class.
(3) None of the cell phone digital camera-taken photos we've seen of American "torture" show
anything like these barbarities happening. Most of the pictures simply show Iraqi P.O.W.s with bags over their heads, with
smiling American personnel nearby. The on-going investigation reports, however, that including Afghanistan and Iraq, as many
as 39 wrongful homicides of prisoners may have occurred. The problem in Iraq seems centered on a section of the Abu Ghuraib
prison (not "Abu Grave," as Tom Brokaw insists on pronouncing it), where the the 372nd M.P. Company was operationally in charge
of tending to the prisoners prior to interrogation. While higher ups may eventually be held politically accountable, the real
facts still center on six Reservists in this one particular M.P. company, and two individuals in particular, Spc. Charles
Graner, 35, and his girlfriend, Pfc. Lynndie England, 21. She has been confined to Ft. Bragg since the Army actually began
investigating these reported abuses earlier this year, before the "pictures" came out. While we have not read ths USG classified
report, the details our Newstand has been receiving from Iraq suggest that at least some of the Iraqi prisoners concerned
were referred to by USG Arabic civilian interpreters as laughing at falsely alleged sexual advances by female U.S. soldiers
and, in response, those prisoners were stripped naked, beaten, sodomized, and had photographs taken of them with bags over
their heads, or in other humiliating poses.
This Association, we point out, lobbied assiduously years ago against women in combat roles in the
ground forces for reasons which generically, and clearly, apply to the problems created in a mixed sex hostile near-combat
situation by Spc. Graner's influence over Lynndie England in this case, but we were not listened to. We stand by our
previous efforts and arguments.
UPDATE: Apparently somebody told Brokaw about our comment. On 5/19, he changed his
pronunciation to a new one: Now it's "Abu-Grab." Hey, Brokaw, it's easy: It's "Abu Gah-raib," with a slight glottal accent
on the "Gah," the last "a" is long, and the "b" at the end is a "b," not a "v." What's so hard about it?
FURTHER UPDATE 5/21/2004: Not only does Brokaw finally pronounce it right, but, as
if to make up for piling it on on the Abu Ghuraib story, NBC-TV News does a Saddam torture story, mentioning briefly that
Saddam carried out tortures far worse, and over a period of 20 years.
FURTHER UPDATE: President Bush, on 5/24/2004, in his speech at the War College in
Pennsylvania, pronounced it "Abu-Gha-reb," with difficulty, but at least he was closer than Brokaw. Jay Leno, on Bush's mispronunciation
5/25/2004, laughing at his own joke: "Well, those Navy guys weren't too happy with that." It's O.K., Jay,
we were. We're not the FBI, and we do have a sense of humor. [Even Jay Leno reads this Website.]
UPDATE: What is the origin of the distinctive type
of headgear the prisoners are being forced to wear in these photos? We have to report, in full disclosure, that there are
stories circulating in Iraq that the 'Klansman' type hats being featured are in response to an Executive Board Public Resolution
of this Association posted earlier this year on our Homepage (and still posted there) calling the jihadists the "Ku Klux
Klansmen" of Islam.
(4) Our troops, our CIA officers, the American people, are all familiar with these foreign Islamic
fundamentalist terroristic acts of depravity against Americans we mentioned. But we heard nothing out of our liberal anti-American,
yet nevertheless American, as well as our foreign "friends," during these depravations. But we're hearing a lot out of them
now. What hypocrites! What a bunch of whitened sepulchres! They're not newspeople at all. They have an axe to
grind. And they disguise it as "news reporting."
The emphasis, in terms of real news, should not be on our "savages" from small town America. It
should be on their "savages:" the ones who shout "Bomb America" on London streets; who blow up their own people in mosques
throughout the Muslim world; the "people" who decapitate a Jew, Daniel Pearl, because he's a Jew; who mutilate the bodies
of murdered American civilians, young men and women, who came to their country simply to preach the freedom of man.
The lovers of the terrorists are saying, in effect, that My Lai, and what happened there, should
have defined how we fought the Vietnam War. In effect, they're saying that because U.S. soldiers and Marines flame-throwed
to death, not just surrendering Japanese soldiers, but Japanes women and children (civilians stationed on the Pacific atolls
Japan claimed), that that should have controlled the way we went forward with the World War II Pacific war. In fact, these
events were not controlling at all as to either the purposes of prosecuting those wars, or the overall way they were prosecuted.
It is a question of emphasis. When we take relatively infrequent events and call them "systemic" at the drop of a hat, there
is more than a slight degree of intellectual dishonesty going on.
Where is the emphasis of these politicians, these media types? Have these people no moral or intellectual
shame at all?
We doubt they do.
(5) In our original comments in our 2002 GITMO story about the inadvisability of taking P.O.W.s
in the War on Terror, for one, because we foresaw many of these custody problems coming, and because we discounted the true
value of most intelligence we were getting from them (although we stopped short of calling military intelligence an oxymoron,
as others have done), we said that combatants on the battlefield should be shot in the heat of battle. We took tens of
thousands of Viet Cong prisoners during the Vietnam War, and interrogated them. We did not get a single piece of operational
intelligence out of any of them that won that lost war. Many of them were tortured. Instead, we should have killed all those
murderous terrorists on the battlefield. Josh Lyman, the fictional political advisor to the fictional President Bartlet,
got fairly close to summing up this Newstand's philosophy of how to deal with foreign terrorists in this week's episode
of the West Wing: "First, kill them. Then, kill everybody who supports them. Then, kill everybody who was happy about
them." John Toland, in his book, The Rising Sun, points out, as we mentioned, that U.S. Marines in the South
Pacific during World War II routinely shot or flame-throwed to death surrendering Japanese soldiers. No interrogations. And
no UCMJ charges were ever brought. There is no need to arrest and interrogate these people from the battlefield in the War
on Terror. They are murderous savages and should be dealt with on the battlefield, period.
If someone is walking around on the street, or taking a cab ride, and is arrested, that's a different
story. Why we need a lot of these latter groups of prisoners, we also continue to question, however. They don't provide a
lot of intelligence. Let our intelligence services get their intelligence somewhere else. There are lots of other sources
to mine, without torturing non-productive fanatics.
UPDATE: The very afternoon we posted our story here with the preceding analysis,
the USG released 300 Iraqis from Abu Ghuraib.
The combatant terrorist is a savage. He should be killed in combat, on the spot, by our combat forces,
which is what they're trained to do. They are not, and never have been, especially trained in the Byzantine and vague rules
of the Law of War.
There is a Tom Oliphant political cartoon published in the aftermath of the opening of the GITMO
camp. It pictures President Bush shouting at the inmates: "Murderous Terrorist Detainees!" One Red Cross woman is hitting
him with an umbrella, shouting "Heartless Brute," while another Red Cross lady is rushing to the prisoners: "You poor dears,
we're here to protect you." The Muslim terrorists, huddling, are heard to respond to her sotto voce, "And we're here
to kill you."
These people were not in Abu Ghuraib because they were nice folks.
'Nuff said.
UPDATE 5/21/2004: 600 more prisoners were relaesed today from Abu Ghuraib, and the
military plans to release another 4000 soon. One American media outlet immediately jumped on and reported preposterous allegations
by some of the Iraqi releasees that females in the 372nd had made sexual advances to them while they were incarcerated.
More pictures of humiliating poses were also released today: prisoners smeared with
feces; one dead prisoner being dragged; more bags over the head shots.
Also today the American media reported that other units beside the 372nd, both in
Iraq and Afghanistan, were involved in tortures. Even if all their numbers of units are correct, this is still not a problem
"systemic" to the Army or the military, in our opinion.
The bad guys in our national media we're reporting on can say, we know, that they're
not "piling it on" on the torture story, and that they can't balance that reporting with stories of jihadist atrocities, because
they can't report on the real savages, the Islamic savagery, because they can't get inside the camp of the latter to do a
report or reports, because they'd be killed. So they report on the American "bad side" because they know nobody's going to
kill them on that side, but that argument, for a news organization, is, in our opinion, immoral, hypocritical and
irrelevant. Moreover, it's silly for them to say they physically can't report on what guys like Al-Sadr are doing when this
Newstand, with its limited resources, has.
They are, by the fact itself, "piling it on," and their own prevarications and
sophistries as to why they're piling it on, only make what they're doing worse.
UPDATE: Paul Wolfowitz, Assistant SecDef, apologized
for making comments similiar to the ones we made about American liberal journalists in this piece, on 6/24/2004.
The Association is not apologizing for its comments.
34 journalists have been killed in Iraq covering
the war.
"When you deal with a beast, you've got to treat them like a beast."
- President Harry S. Truman, commenting on his authorization to drop atomic bombs
on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, acts which killed over 200,000 Japanese non-combatants in the space of 60 minutes in 1945.
UPDATE 3/9/2006:
The Department of Defense announced today it will permanently turn over control
of the Abu Ghuraib prison to the Iraqi government within three months, and transfer Coalition prisoners there to what
is now being called Camp Crocker, where Saddam Hussein is currently being held.
5/14/2004:
Israeli helicopters blow up a building in Gaza known to be used to raise money for Islamic Jihad.
Too bad the Attorneys General and county prosecutors in certain American states weren't doing
the same to these folks in Illinois, New York, California, Pennsylvania and certain other states, while, instead, they were
so busy attacking patriotic police and firefighter groups.
5/30/2004:
Andy Rooney's Memorial Day Address
We respond here to the comment of CBS-TV's "60 Minutes' commentator
Andy Rooney on 5/30/2004 about the "idiocy" of America's wars.
All wars are not idiotic. Some are just wars.
It is idiotic for malfeasants to say,' This is my religion. I
hate all others of a different religion, and I will kill them, and start wars against them.'
That is what the Muslim jihadists have said, and have done, and
are doing, to the United States, its people, and its way of life. Equally, that is also true about what co-religionists have
done recently in a place far removed from Islam, in Northern Ireland.
That's what's idiotic.
It is not idiotic to respond to these murderes, all of them,
in self defense, or to establish a peace. That is not idiocy. That is justice.
Over one million Americans have died in all of America's wars.
We hope and pray to the God of all our fathers, the Assembler
of the universe, and we believe, in each and every case, that each one of them died for justice, and that they all sit in
a special place within nature's Providence today.
So say we, the membership of United States Navy Veterans
Association, in response to Mr. Rooney's comment on this Memorial Day, 2004.
And we are not happy with his remark.
6/3/2004
OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM UPDATE, AFGHANISTAN
Since the ousting of the Taliban, there has been a quiet buildup of U.S. Forces in Afghanistan,
to approximately 20,000 today, up from a low force level of 10,000. (Most from the Army's 25th Division.)
This Newstand stands today by its eralier analysis made shortly after the fall of the Taliban, that
without these troops, the pro-American Karzai government would fall.
6/5/2004:
FRENCH ANTI-AMERICAN DEMONSTRATIONS
Hundreds of thousands of Frenchmen turn out in the streets of Paris denouncing President Bush, who
was staying in Paris today for the D-Day memorial ceremonies in Normandy tomorrow, as a war criminal who needs to be tried.
This was on the day Ronald Reagan died.
These people may be citizens of, and voters in, France, and considered by the French government
to be French patriots.
But to us, they are, and will forever remain, simply terrorists, and the allies of terrorists. the
only graetness they recognize is the accomodation of fleeing in the face of danger. We do not need the likes of them. Nor
do we want their money.
They are, for all practical purposes, as John Cochran, ABC-TV News reporter in France in the 1980's,
said tonight on American TV, the same Frenchmen who used to call Ronald Reagan 'that stupid cowboy actor.' And they are, in the
opinion of this Newstand's Editorial staff, for all practical purposes, the same Frenchmen who appeased Hitler rather
than face his wrath.
There are lots of countries in the world, we remind our readers, that you, as an American tourist,
can choose to visit or, as an American investor, can choose to invest in, other than France.
We may want their government on our side, but we do not need them, or their cheap support, which
they only intuitively extend to anyone when it is crassly self-serving. If any future American President says otherewise as
a matter of policy than we, as a matter of policy, say that President is mistaken.
'They counted on America to be passive....
They counted wrong.'
- Ronald Reagan, on the unilateral U.S. strike on Libyan terrorist Muammar Gaddafi
6/18/2004
PUTIN SUPPORTS BUSH'S POSITION ON SADDAM
President Vladimir Putin of Russia publicly announced today that
in 2001 and 2002 the Russian Intelligence Service had credible reports that Saddam's government was plotting concretely to
carry out terrorist attacks against the USG, both inside the U.S., and also without.
6/18/2004
President Bush announces at Ft. Lewis,
Washington that his Administration will continue to try to overthrow governments which sponsor terrorist acts
on the United states.
Given the fact this Association posted this very recommendation
on an Executive Board Public Resolution (EBPR) on our Homepage only a couple of days ago, and that our Site is accessed at the highest
SecDef levels on a daily basis, we'd say it is not a coincidence.
And we still say our EBPR is good military and political policy
for the near term future, for any Administration.
| Kim Sun-Il |
|
|
| Immediately before his beheading by Al Quaida |
6/27/2004
BEHEADINGS AND OTHER MURDERS
On or around 6/18/2004, Al Quaidists murdered and beheaded 49
year old Paul Johnson, an American contractor kidnapped in Saudi Arabia. Johnson loved Saudi Arabia, and chose to remain there
after Americans were warned to leave by the State Department.
The main perpetrator of this atrocity was Abdel Aziz al-Mugrin,
the head of Al Quaida in Saudi Arabia (a 'freedom fighter,' just like Ho Chi Minh - yeah, right!). He was killed by Saudi
forces the same day, but wsa immediarely replaced by an ex-Saudi policeman, the Number 4 man on Saudi Arabia's Most
Wanted List.
Johnson's murderers took photographs of his body after they beheaded
him. We warn all our visitors that these pictures are grisly. THEY ARE NOT FOR THE FAINT OF HEART, NOR SHOULD THERY
BE VIEWED BY MINORS. But they are part of the news, and they make the points by picture raised in this news and analysis
piece.
On 6/22/2004 Al Quaida beheaded a South Korean in Iraq, Kim Sun-Il,
33. a civilian working for a security firm.
On or around 6/27/2004, Al Quaida shot to death a U.S. Army Specialist, Keith Matt Maupin, 20, who
had been captured from a convoy west of Baghdad 79 days previous.
All these murders, by the way, are not "executions," as they outrageously have been called by, among
others, Margaret Warner of PBS-TV's Newshour with Jim Lehrer (Lehrer himself advisedly refers to them as "killings.),
and by Brian ("Never Blinks") Williams, news anchor for NBC-TV's Nightly News. Executions are acts carried out to cause the
death of real criminals in capital cases by real governments.
Calling these murders "executions" by these so-called "newscasters" would be identical to them saying
John F. Kennedy was "executed" by Lee Harvey Oswald, or that the victims at the Murragh Building in Oklahoma City were
"executed" by Timothy McVeigh.
These were not executions. They were, and are, barbaric and savage acts of murder.
"It is in the nature of great events to obscure the great events that came before them."
- American historian Francis Parkman (1823 - 1893):
Donald Rumsfeld: These are the same tactics we saw in Vietnam (Our opinion: Correct!) to break the
will of the U.S. and its people. They can't defeat us on the battlefield.
Our opinion: Correct, they never defeated us on the battlefield in Vietnam, but it didn't matter,
because they did break the will of the American people, thanks in part to so-called veterans throwing their medals back over
the fence at Congress.

| "It is in the nature of great events to obscure |
|
|
| the great events that came before them." - American historian Francis Parkman (1823-1893) |
Jane McCrea, an American loyalist living in New York during the early days of the American Revolution, was
killed and scalped by Indian savages aligned against the Americans.
And, later in the Revolution, as they knew they were losing, redcoated dragoons under Lt. Colonel Banastre
Tarleton would rampage through our South, bayonetting wounded American soldiers as they lay helpless on the ground, shooting
young boys in the back, burning plantations, raping American women, and hanging as spies uniformed Continental troops, all
in violation of the understood laws of warfare.
During that time, we Americans rallied around these martyrs with our resolution, which was extremely
difficult, with a full 1/3rd of our population supporting our enemies, to follow through, to carry on.
Our Newstand staff would like to know if we are going to see a two month long media frenzy on the Al Quaida
beheadings and murders, these unparalleled modern day barbarities, with non-stop questions flying about how far up and down
the Al Quaida chain of command responsibility lies, as we did with Abu Ghuraib.
It's not a rhetorical qusetion.
May God bless Paul Johnson.
ARTICLE UPDATE - 7/28/2004 - AS
TO NBC-TV NEWS:
Tom Brokaw begins to refer to these killings of innocents by the terrorists, uniformly,
as "murders." Belated congratulations, Tom, and we hope and expect that will set the standard for your News Division.
Tom reports on this same night on the NBC-TV Nightly News, accurately, that one Al
Quaidist suicide bomber killed 72 new Iraqi police recruits in Baquba with a car bomb. In the same 24 hour period the terrorists
killed 4 Allied soldiers in Iraq, two of them Americans.
This Newstand wants to do the obvious-to-us statistics on the Baquba mass murder.
If one Al Quaidist suicidalist is permitted to kill 70 pro-American Arabs in one blow day in and day out in the Muslim world,
it will not take long to kill every decent man, woman and child in that world.
For that matter, anywhere.
If the Al Quaidists had 100,000 suicidalists worlwide, and they may easily have, with
this ratio, they could kill 7,000,000 innocent people. (19 suicidalists killed 3,000 on 9/11, a ratio of 1:158.) and
the Baquba murders were an easy kill: One car bomber, one crowd lined up on a public street.
We hate to be mathematical about this, but those are the numbers.
The numbers never lie.
Count the numbers.
They have, and that is the reason, by the numbers, why we are not safe.
UPDATE ON JIHADIST IRAQI MURDERS:
BAGHDAD, Nov. 16 -- The British government concluded Tuesday that Margaret Hassan, a British-Iraqi
relief official who worked on behalf of poor Iraqis for more than 20 years, was probably killed by kidnappers who seized her
in Baghdad a month ago.
The abduction of Hassan, 59, had provoked
outrage among Iraqis. Hassan had remained in the country in support of humanitarian efforts during and after the U.S. invasion, which she opposed, defying risks that led most aid organizations to withdraw
from Iraq.
6/23/2004
AN END TO TSA AIRPORT SCREENERS?
The Bush Administration is backing off, as the threat of another
9/11 dies down gradually, from the requirements of CAPS II. But they're doing so, as all politicians do on controversial issues,
through the back door.
By executive order, starting in late 2005, any airport can fire
all their TSA screeners and hire private screeners (at a lower cost).
Many, if not most, airports will do this. And a return to the
old system, which is what thsi is, will mean that these people are not higher paid USG employees, they will be lower paid
airport contract employees, and their primary allegiance will be, not to national security, but to getting those passengers
through the line as fast as possible.
This Newstand staff's opinion: Better to have kept the TSA screeners,
and to have revised CAPS II to focus on the people who are the real threat.
6/28/2004
PADILLA AND RELATED CASES
By a 6-3 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, all 600 prisoners,
American or not, at GITMO, can file review cases (Habeas Corpus Petitions) in the federal court system as to their treatment,
and as to the disposition of their cases.
At the same time, Navy Secretary Gordon England has been given
the responsibility by the Bush Administration to review all these cases for possible release (See our earlier Newstand pieces
for our predictions), with the exception of three cases President Bush has already determined will go to U.S. military tribunals
for adjudication.
While this Association might understand the extension of the
logic of the Supreme Court majority to U.S. citizen prisoners, we do not understand why it has to be extended to foreigners.
The technical resaon cited by the 6 is that GITMO is, effectively
speaking, U.S. soil.
That conclusion is, in our opinion, a stretch of logic based
on a hair splitting analysis of the treaty with Cuba giving us status at GITMO.
As to Jose Padilla personally, the Supreme Court told him he filed his habeas
corpus petition in the wrong court, and to file it again in the right one. Our opinion is that the right one, for him, is
located in hell.
UPDATE 7/9/2004;
In response to the Padilla and related cases,
jurisdiction for administrative review of the GITMO cases was transferred yesterday from Secretary England by the Bush Administration
to what will be called Combatant Status Review Tribunals. Each military tribunal will be staffed with three officers as judges
and each GITMO prisoner can present his own case that he was not an "enemy combatant" against the U.S. The burden of proof
will be for the governemnt to show the opposite by "a preponderance of the evidence."
This move is designed to address the Supreme Court's concern
expressd in the Hamdi case (one of the related cases) that none of the GITMO prisoners had ever been given
any "due process" hearing. This decision to create these tribunals does not per se overule any of the other orders
of the Supreme Court in the Padilla cases, but, instead, provides the USG with a "due process" transcript,
in any future habeas corpus proceeding, to say to the District Court judge that the petitioner was already given
a due process hearing on his status, and that the decision of the USG on his case and status should be given the greatest
deference.
We said in our initial analysis piece that the Supreme Court
was 'hairsplitting," over whether GITMO was U.S. soil, and that is true. Well, in this decision to set up these tribunals,
some very smart DOJ lawyers who tell the DoD what to do, hair split the Padilla decisions and came up with
this as the Government's next move.
| The security barrier is partially a wall |

|
| and mostly a fence. |
7/9/2004
U.N.'S INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE RULES
ON ISRAELI SECURITY FENCE
The civil division of the U.N.'s International Court of Justice
in the Hague (not the criminal division, known better as the International Court of Criminal Justice, or ICCJ) has ruled 14-1
that the Israeli security barrier, which , even though it is incomplete, has already saved many Israeli lives, is illegal,
because it is an affront to the Palestinian Authority. The security barrier, about 25% completed, is partially a "wall," and
mostly a "fence."
This decsion has no binding effect on the Israelis, who said
the decision was biased. It is biased, and outrageously so.
The 16-1 political vote of this court, this crowd of international
legal creeps, shows what would happen if U.S. soldiers or officials were subject to the jurisdiction of the ICCJ. This Association
disagrees with U.S. Senator John Edwards of North Carolina, who voted to subject all U.S. military and official personnel
to the jurisdiction of that court. We said that that is bad poicy, and a denigration of our sovereignty.
The Bush Administration put out a statement immediately after
the security fence decision saying that these sorts of decisions should be decided by international political discussions among
governments and not, impliedly, by a so-called "court."
This Association agrees.
7/13/2004
PHILIPPINE GOVERNMENT PULLOUT IN IRAQ?
The Philippine government says it will withdraw its 51 peacekeepers
in Iraq "as soon as possible," in response to an Al Quaida/Ansar al-Islam threat to murder a Filipino civilian captive
if the Philippines did not withdraw its troops immediately.
The USG said today it was disappointed in President Arroyo's
statement.
This Association is too.
7/14/2004
AFGHANISTAN VS. IRAQ: AN ANALYSIS UPDATE
There are 17,000 U.S troops in Afghanistan as of today, and 6,500
NATO troops (European and Canadian). The NATO troops are based mostly in Kabul, the capital, and will not deploy to the insurgenct
prone areas of southern and eastern Afghanistan, where, as this Newstand reported earlier Al Quaida and Taliban acivities
are picking up. Yet the level of opposition to the local regime and to U.S. Forces is nothing like Iraq, even though the two
countries have roughly the same population size.
Why is this? We asked our analysts:
The answer lies largely how we went into the two countries. In
Afghanistan we utilized an already in-place native, anti-Taliban political and military group, the Northern Alliance,
largely an amalgamation of individual warlords' militias. At the time we went in, the Northern Alliance held only about 10%
of the territory of the country, a tiny sliver along its northeastern border, but that was enough. The USG trained them, armed
them, and assisted them, both with military advisors and troops, as well as covert action operatives from the CIA. The Northern
Alliance was pro-U.S., and, unlike the mujaheddin during the Afghan war against the Soviets, was likely to remain so for the
long term.
In Iraq, the USG rejected that model. We had the opportunity
in the north of Iraq of utilizing the pro-U.S. Kurds and their Pesh Murga militia, but that option was rejected by analysts
at State and CIA because they knew doing so meant that the long-term USG vision for Iraq would have had to necessarily
include an independent Iraqi Kurdistan, with all the trouble that meant, amd the probable breakup of Iraq into three parts:
Kurdistan, a central Sunni authority, and a southern Shiite authority. This model was unacceptable to those planners. So
we had no domestic force to rely on in Iraq. We attempted, and are attempting, to do it all ourselves.
There is a price, of course, for our relative success in Afghanistan,
and that is rampant warlordism in the country today. That warlordism has caused the postponement of the Afghan presidential
election, which Hamid Karzai, the current president, is still expected to win, until October 9 of this year, and the
postponemnt of elections for the new Afghan parliament until April or May of next year.
That price, warlordism, is a price we may just have to be willing
to pay in Afhanistan. It is, in fact, better than the alternative of the Taliban.
7/17/2004
9/11 HIJACKERS GOT PASSAGE THROUGH IRAN
As many as 10 of the 19 9/11 hijackers were given passage from Afghanistan through the mullahs'
Iran, part of an axis of evil aligned against American interests worldwide, to Saudi Arabia, where they embarked for the U.S.,
the U.S. 9/11 Commission has reported.
ARAFAT, GAZA AND HAMAS
Arafat's second prime minister attempted to resign today, citing the disintegration of Gaza into
"chaos" because of Hamas terrorist militant activity. Arafat refuses to let the Palestinian police or security forces do anything
about the militants, or to turn over real control of either force to anyone other than himself.
Many within Hamas despise Arafat as corrupt, as has been previously featured in stories on this
Newstand. If free elections were held within Palestine today, Hamas, which is much more anti-Jewish, and anti-Israel than
Arafat, would win. Many within Hamas, seeing little chance of such elections in the short term, would like to pick a
fight with Arafat and his forces.
7/23/2004
9/11 COMMISSION REPORT
The U.S. 9/11 Commssion report, synthesized, says that the Clinton and Bush Administrations
both could have seen 9/11 coming and, accordingly, could have done more to prevent 9/11.
This Newstand's Editorial Staff disputes the artful political wording of that fundamental claim
as to both Administrations (the Commission is in fact a creation of the U.S. Congress and not the executive branch of government),
although we do not dispute the unspoken premise of the Commission that we should have done more during those years, as well
as today, to take an aggressive war to the Al Quaidists wherever on this globe they can be found and, as the membership of
this Association believe, with no preconditions of asking anybody's permission or of 'making nice' with anybody first and,
if nobody will support us, to do so unilaterally, with no apologies, and no regrets.
This Newstand has some comments on some specific issues raised by the Report:
The choice
we have with the jihadists is not a choice between war and peace. It is a choice between war and prolonged war. Usama is a
recruiting magnet for 300 million Muslims who hate the U.S. Moreover, even if Israel disappeared tomorrow, their focus to
destroy the United States would not be affected one whit. We do not have enough manpower, even if we drafted every U.S. male
over the age of 16, to occupy all their nations indefinitely. And we don't have enough money in the U.S. Treasury to fund
massive new educational systems in all those nations to create viable alternative to the jihadist madrasas.
Nor will simply creating an Intelligence czar, responsible to no one but himself, be a quick fix,
for a variety of reasons. First, this type of high level position in the USG has historically, and with the possible exception
only of the FRB Chairman, always been responsible to the American people through their elected officials. To, on top of that
lack of accountability, give such a czar the power to fire people whom only the President can fire now, like the DCI, only
makes this mentioned problem far, far worse.
Such a new position also inherently creates more layering, more bureaucratization, within the national
intelligence community. What we need is less bureaucratization, and more centralization of that community. That was the original
intent of the National Security Act of 1947, and the office in which that centralization was to be placed was that of Director
of Central Intelligence (DCI), today a Cabinet level official. We already have a sharing of the responsibility
for intelligence, post 9/11, between the DCI and the Secreatry of Homeland Security (SHS). To create a third office is not
centralization, it's chaos, and it's counterproductive to the very substantive analysis of the Commission itself. This Association
called for, in the past, on its Newstands, more centralization of the ability to 'connect the dots' of intelligence on domestic
terrorism, in the Office of the Secretary of Homeland Security. That has not, we also point out, as to domestic terrorism,
occurred enough. But these two offices, DCI and SHS, are enough. To create more offices is not an answer to the problem; it
just makes the 'blame game' when something goes wrong and, trust us, something will go wrong again, larger.
The Commission is entirely correct in concluding that we are not safe, something this Assocation
has consistently been saying out loud on this Site since 9/11, but it is more a question of substantively and aggressively
doing something about the jihadist threat, than it is a question procedurally about how we process intelligence on it.
But both are important.
UPDATE 8/5/2004:
The Creation of the Office of
DNI
Let us redact (not retract) our previous analysis in terms of the creation of a Director
of National intelligence (DNI), in light of the fleshing out of this idea which has already started in both the Executive
and Congressional branches.
This Newstand and this Association, going back to the original, and different, proposals
for a Director of Homeland Security, supported the idea of centralization of intelligence gathering and reporting, including
the idea that some office needed to be created which could 'butt heads' when intelligence reporters (from, as of present,
about 15 different agencies) disagreed.
Such a person should have, in the opinion of this Newstand, no operational controls
over those agencies, and, as to budget authority, at most, control over only his or her own staff. (Budget authority
means the ability to independently propose a budget and, once appopriated by Congress, to decide how it is to be spent.) The
fact that those agencies compete with each other to gather and report intelligence adds to a mix where good intelligence rises
to the top in the marketplace of counter-arguments and dissent as to the validity of particular pieces of intelligence, as
opposed to the reverse. No'czar' should be able to quell dissenting opinions within the intelligence community. That, in turn,
means such an officer should be given no power to hire or fire Presidential appointees. It goes without saying, in what we
have just said, that DNI should be given no operational or budgetary authority over the DoD. If Congress did that, they might
just as well abolish the office of the Secretary of Defense.
There is talk of giving such an officer a 10 year term, like the office of FBI director.
Fine, on its face. But the President could, if necessary, order th
|